+91 74838 06607 info@origiin.com

Prosthetics: The IP Landscape

Executive Summary

Over 1 billion users currently need assistive technology. This figure is expected to reach 2 billion by 2050 as the population ages and consumer electronics and assistive products converge. The market is shaped not only by demographics and the demand for consumer electronics, and the investment this attracts, but by legislation and policies. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) recognizes access to assistive technology as a human right, bringing with it state obligations and expected market influence. Data shows that emerging products are usually not replacing conventional assistive products, but complementing them[1]. And as these assistive technologies improve, so do people’s lives.

What are prosthetic devices? 

A prosthetic device an “artificial device to replace or augment a missing or impaired part of the body”.[2] Although modern medicine and advancements in assistive technology may paint prosthesis as a product of later scientific developments, the use of artificial limbs to better human function dates back as early as 1,600 B.C. The use of an artificial toe around the foot of a Mummy dating back between 950 B.C. to 710 B.C.[3] confirms the fact that prosthesis has been around for ages. History is replete with examples of prosthetic devices even before the advent of modern medicine such as Barbarossa’s silver arm, Gotz of the Iron Hand and many more.

Prosthesis thereby play a vital role in helping people live a life of normalcy. Not only do prostheses help in functionality, but they also hold sociological importance. They help overcome the social stigma around this subject by giving users a new chance at life through artificial means. It is for this reason that they are also known as rehabilitation devices.

Today, technology has infiltrated every aspect of our lives, especially the medical industry. Prosthesis is one such industry that has profited tremendously due to the onslaught of cutting-edge technology and artificial intelligence. Earlier what were made with harnesses and knee lock controls, prostheses now are specialised based on every patients requirements and are equipped with assistive controls that follow realistic commands such as moving one’s fingers, making fists, pinching, etc.

It’s a heady time to be involved in prosthetic technology and development – one marked by quantum leaps in research and understanding how human bodies, and brains, work. From artificial limbs to exoskeletons, the field of prosthetics is exploding with new technologies designed to improve the quality of life for patients. The technology used for prosthetic limbs now includes 3D printing, device implants, digital design tools, and more. As scientists learn more about how the human body functions, prosthetic limbs will start to feel and behave like the real thing[4].

Presently, research in prosthetic technology primarily focuses on:

  1. 3D-Printed Prosthetics,
  2. Thought-Controlled Prosthetics to restore the sensation of touch,
  3. Neuroprosthetics,
  4. Brain activity mapping,
  5. Ambionics Tests

Applications and types of prosthetic devices

Since prosthetic devices are essentially substitutes for actual body parts, their most important application is to replace, correct or support a body part. There exist a variety of prostheses in the market today. Based on the positioning of the device, i.e., upper extremity or lower extremity, there exist different types of devices. There are also active and passive prostheses: active prostheses perform actual movement and bodily function while passive prostheses serve artificial purposes.

There are broadly three types of upper extremity prostheses:[5]

  1. Transradial prostheses: Transradial prostheses attaches below the elbow. These can be either active (powered by myoelectric signals or cables connected to the body) or passive.
  2. Transhumeral prostheses: Transhumeral prostheses is connected above the elbow but below the shoulder. Since they replace a majority of the arm, they are more complicated to make as they compensate for a missing elbow as well. They too come in active or passive forms.
  3. Silicon hands, fingers, and arms.

For the lower extremity prostheses, there broadly exist two types:[6]

  1. Transtibial prostheses: These attach below the knee and their primary function is to distribute the weight as the mobility of the leg remains due to the presence of the knee. Most patients require rehabilitation with this kind of prostheses as the foot usually doesn’t move.
  2. Transfemoral prostheses: Transfemoral prostheses are the most complicated of the aforementioned prostheses as they replace a majority of the leg by attaching above the knee but below the hips. In this case, there is a special socket mechanism designed to replicate the structure of the knee thereby giving mobility to the user. Patients in this case too require rehabilitation before they can fully use their prosthetic leg. The prosthetic socket is the main connection between the prosthetic limb and the residual limb which distributes the forces through the residual limb.

Prosthodontics is a branch of dentistry that deals with prosthetic devices designed for the purpose of replacing missing or damaged teeth. Prosthodontics is becoming highly relevant with the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) which is being deployed to enhance the industry. There are four branches of prosthodontics. These are:

  1. Fixed prostheses: These are permanent prosthodontics and include devices such as crowns, bridges, onlays, inlays and veneers.
  2. Removable prostheses: These are designed to last for long periods of time subject to replacement or removal for cleaning. They are not fixed but fitted. Examples include dentures and gingival veneers.
  3. Implant prostheses: These implants such as small titanium cylinders are designed to hold the prosthetic device in place to secure their position inside the mouth.
  4. Maxillofacial prostheses: These focus on correcting malformed or missing tissues that may be congenital (acquired from birth) or may be a result of an injury, illness or disease. These can be intra-oral (inside the body) such as palate covers, palate lifts, jaw replacements, etc. or extra-oral (outside the body) such as eye (ocular, orbital), ear (auricular), radiation shields, etc.[7]

The Working and Science behind prosthetics

The documentation of limb amputations and availability of prostheses is scarcely documented.

However, statistics from the USA show that 41,000 persons live there with substantial upper-limb absences. In addition, 5-6,000 major limb amputations are performed in England each year with around a fifth of these involving the upper limb[8].

With more research and development in the field of prostheses, multiple ways of making artificial limbs have been devised. More recently, the integration of sophisticated technology is one of them. This includes AI (Artificial Intelligence) aided prosthetic limbs. The prosthesis is first used on the functioning arm. The AI integrated in this learns and remembers the actions of this arm which is then attached to the phantom arm. AI has made possible incredibly accuracy of limb movements such as pinching and naturalised the whole process for the user.

Another popular prosthesis mechanism is the mind-control prosthesis or the brain-computer interface integrated neuroprosthesis which can recognize real-time data as well as learn virtual functions.

Prosthetic limbs are made from materials lighter than the conventional ones such as wood and plastic. Prosthetic companies now use urethanes, silicone, and mineral-based liners to improve the product flexibility and comfort. This contributes to the prostheses’ flexibility which has fuelled the global artificial limbs and body parts industry.

The major types of Prosthetics include:

  • Upper Extremity
  • Lower Extremity
  • Liners
  • Sockets

While the primary Modular Components are:

  • Orthotics Upper Limb
  • Lower Limb
  • Spinal

The Market Players

Newly released Prosthetics and Orthotics Market analysis report by Future Market Insights shows that global Prosthetics & Orthotics Market sales in 2022 were held at US$ 6.5 Billion. With a CAGR of 6% from 2023 to 2033, the market is projected to cross US$ 12 Billion by 2033. The market through Orthotics is expected to generate significant revenue and is projected to grow at a CAGR of around 6% from 2023 to 2033.[9]

Attribute Details
Global Prosthetics and Orthotics Market (2023) US$ 6.8 Billion
Global Prosthetics and Orthotics Market (2033) US$ 12.2 Billion
Global Prosthetics and Orthotics Market CAGR (2023 to 2033) 6%
USA Prosthetics and Orthotics Market CAGR (2023 to 2033) 5.6%

As per the Prosthetics & Orthotics Market research by Future Market Insights – a market research and competitive intelligence provider, historically, from 2018 to 2022, the market value of the Prosthetics & Orthotics Market increased at around 5.3% CAGR[10].

Some factors that influence the Prosthetics & Orthotics industry include the increased frequency of neurological disorders and cardiovascular diseases that damage the patients’ neural and spinal systems. As discussed in section 2.3 of this report, the technical advancements in the prosthetics industry are to play a huge role in influencing the industry. Furthermore, the rise in number of trauma cases is expected to boost the orthopaedics industry. The influence of phantom limb pain and residual limb pain due to the prolonged usage of prosthetics devices has increased in users thereby giving way for newer, better technologies to replace them.

The key providers of prosthetics and orthotics include Ossur, Blatchford, Inc., Fillauer LLC, Otto bock Healthcare GmbH, The Ohio Willow Wood Company, Ultraflex Systems, and Steeper Group.[11]

Endolite announcing its fully integrated, microprocessor-controlled lower limb system Linx that has been awarded the German Design Award in the Universal Design Category in October 2022 is a notable development amongst the Prosthetics and Orthotics providers.[12]

The Market Dynamics

The global prosthetics and orthotics market is categorized into orthotics and prosthetics on the basis of their types. The orthotics market holds the largest revenue share of around 75% in 2021, due to the increase in the prevalence of osteoarthritis, sports injuries and the penetration of orthopaedic technologies.[13] The dominance of the orthotics sector can be attributed to the fact that they are recommended for fixing or accommodating foot deformities, aligning and supporting the ankle or foot. Further, the increase in recorded number of spine injuries and the cumulative occurrences of osteoarthritis are additional factors contributing to the increasing sales of orthotics. These solutions also offer tremendous potential in minimizing pain and addressing physical and postural problems.

Prosthetics type is sub-divided into modular components, liners, lower extremity, and upper extremity. The prosthetics market is anticipated to witness substantial growth in the years to come due to the upsurge in disability rates globally. Some prominent manufacturing companies in this industry include Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc., Ossur HF and Blatchford Inc. According to the report published by the Rehabilitation Research and Training Centre on Disability Statistics and Demographics, in 2018, the percentage of people with disabilities in the United States increased from around 11.9% in 2010 to 12.9% in 2017, thereby leading to increasing demand for prosthetics in the country[14]

Drivers: Rise in demand for orthotic devices – The demand for orthotics devices can be attributed to multiple factors. The ageing population, for instance, is more prone to suffer from ailments such as osteoarthritis, osteoporosis and more bone-injury related ailments. There is also an increase in sport-related injuries. Orthotic devices are great alternatives to surgical deformity repair and pain management. Furthermore, the technological advancements in the prosthetics and orthotics market are making the orthotic products more affordable and accessible. Thus, this rising demand is boosting the overall growth of the prosthetics and orthotics market during the forecast period.

Restraints: Lack of consumer awareness – Although there have many technological advancements in the prosthetics and orthotics sector, the lack of consumer awareness in developing and under-developed countries acts as a setback for the progress of this industry. Since these devices are used to reduce pain, people with orthopaedic disorders can utilise these devices. However, the lack of awareness poses as an obstacle to this.

Opportunities: Rising geriatric population – According to the United Nations, the global population of people aged 60 and more is predicted to grow to 2.1 billion to 2050. People over 60 are more prone to illnesses like osteoporosis and osteopenia, which increases the demand for orthopaedic solutions.[15] Thus, the growing senior population globally is one of the main causes of the increasing demand for prosthetics and orthotics in the world.

Challenges: Higher cost of orthotic devices – With technological advancements in this sector, the cost as well as demand for customized orthotic devices has increased. Due to their low cost and accessibility, pre-fabricated devices are still being extensively used despite the fact that customized orthotic devices offer more functionality. Nowadays, pre-fabricated orthotic devise are highly advanced and come in various types and ranges depending on the diseases and ailments they cater to. As a result, customized orthotics are finding it difficult to compete and this is one of the biggest challenges for the growth of the prosthetics and orthotics market.

The Industry Analysis: The IP Scenario

Patent Trends

Leading Assignees

Edward Lifesciences dominates the prosthetic patent landscape with its aggressive filing of patent applications in tis domain and is closely followed by Medtronic Inc. Zimmer Biomet Holding, Johnson & Johnson, Stryker Corp, Abbott Lab, Cook Group Inc, Beijing Akec Medical Co Ltd, Boston Scientific Corp, Otto Bock Healthcare GMBH, Ossur HF and Beijing Chunlizhengda Medical also figures among the leading assignees.

Figure 3 showcases the graphical representation of patenting activity of the leading companies in this domain. Edward Lifesciences filed 557 patent applications in this domain in the last ten years and continued to be a major applicant over the years.

Bock Otto Healthcare Prod GMBH dominates the prosthetic design registration landscape  in this domain and is closely followed by Austin Cole. Medtronic Inc., Zimmer Biomet Holding, Johnson & Johnson, , Stryker Corp, and Abbott Labs also figures among the leading assignees.

Edwards Life Sciences specializes in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic  monitoring. Over the span of the last ten years, they have dominated the patent market by owning 4% of the total patents filed in this period. Medtronic Incorporation is an American company that develops and manufactures healthcare technologies. It comes at a close second by holding 3.9% of the patents in this industry. Other companies such as Zimmer Biomet currently hold 2.4% of the patents, Johnson & Johnson hold 2.3%, Stryker Corp 2.1%. These are the top 5 patent holders in this industry in the last ten years.

Patent Filing Trends

The number of patent applications filed in the prosthetics industry from 2014-2023 have seen an increase in the last few years peaking in 2021 at 1,105 applications. The trend saw a steep decrease in 2022, the lowest record in the last two years. The trends in grants published have been fluctuating with the highest number of grants published in 2014 at 809, and declining steadily since. 2022 saw a slight increase therefore becoming an anomaly in the trend with 485 grants published, the highest since 2017.

Geographical Patent Filing Trends

United States of America emerges as the leading country with 5,864 patents filed in the last ten years in the prosthesis industry.

Leading companies such as Edwards Life Sciences, Medtronic, Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc., Stryker Corp, Abbott Laboratories, Cook Medical Group, Boston Scientific, etc. are based in the United States of America hence making it the world leader in this domain. China is US’s biggest competitor with 2863 patent filings in the last ten years. World players such as Beijing Akec Medical Co Ltd and Beijing Chunlizhengda Medical combined hold about 10% of the country’s prosthesis patents. Following China is Germany at 875 patents. Otto Bock Healthcare GMBH which places 10th on the list of market leaders hails from Germany and holds about 16% of the Germany’s prosthesis patents. France places 4th on the list with 606 patents, followed by South Korea at 454, United Kingdom with 379, Switzerland, Italy, Russia and Ireland. Israel, Australia, Iceland, Japan and Canada are emerging leaders in this domain. 

Trends in various types of prosthetic devices

The highest number of patents are 13,262 and are filed in the CPC group filters implantable into blood vessels, prostheses, i.e., artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body, appliances for connecting them with the body, devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures, e.g. stents. This category broadly includes all kinds of prostheses patents filed in the last ten years. There are 8252 patents for implantable devices, 2682 for special features of prostheses that fall under other CPC groups. The total number of patents for prostheses filed in this period are 13,775.

Design Registration Trends

Leading Assignees

Otto Bock Healthcare GMBH is the global leader in design patent filings in the last ten years. The number of designs filed in the last ten years are significantly lower than the number of patents filed in the same period. This could be because design patents only cater to the appearance or configuration of the product and without any actual functionality or utility. Otto Bock Healthcare GMBH holds 8% of all design patents filed in the last decade. Following Otto Bock Healthcare is Austin Cole with 10 design filings. Other notable players are Cormatrix Cardiovascular Inc. based in the United States of America with 9 design filings, Sutures India Pvt. Ltd. based in India and Coloplast which is a Danish company specialising in developing ostomy, continence, interventional urology, wound and skin care products and services.

Some of the notable patent holders such as Edwards Life Sciences, Stryker Corp, Ossur HF and Otto Bock Healthcare come in the top 20 design holders as well, although their share is significantly lesser in this domain. Edwards Life Sciences merely holds 1.5% of the total design filings, Stryker Corp holds 2.6%  same as Ossur HF.

Design Filing Trends

The design filing trends from 2014-2023 show fluctuation throughout the period. The number of applications filed in this time period hit their second highest peak in 2017 (13) which was a steep increase from 2014. They then saw a significant drop in the years 2018 and 2019 with only 1 design application filed in both these years respectively. 2020 saw an increase in number to 8 applications which then decreased to 5 in 2021. The highest number of design applications were filed in 2022 at 15.

The trends in grants published show a similar fluctuation but more exaggerated. They highest number of grants were published in 2015 which were 34. From the years 2015 to 2018 they saw a steady decline to 9 grants published in 2018. There was a momentary increase from the years 2018 to 2020. 2021 saw the sharpest decline to 8, the lowest number of grants published in the last ten years in the prosthetics industry. However, the number of grants published showed a 200% increase in 2022.

Geographical Design Filing Trends

It is evident from the map above that designs have been filed in very few countries. Some countries such Russia and the African continent have registered zero designs from 2014-2023. The country with the highest number of design filings is the United States of America with 70 design filings which is around 27% of the total design filings in the last ten years. Second on this list is India with 34 design filings accounting to 13% of the total design filings in this period. Amongst the top market assignees, Sutures India Pvt and Chetan Meditech Pvt. Ltd. together make up 35% of the country’s design filings. Third on the list is Germany with 18 design filings. Otto Bock Healthcare that hails from Germany is the owner of maximum number of design filings in the last ten years. Following Germany is Austria with 16 designs (6%), Canada with 11 designs (4%), Iceland with 10 from Ossur HF holding 70% of the country’s design filings. Italy, United Kingdom, Japan and Australia make the top 10 countries in the world in the design filings in the prosthetics industry.

Current IP Scenario

The global orthopaedic prosthetics market will see a 4.5% increase by 2030, with upper extremity prostheses accounting for nearly two-thirds of the market share.[16] In 2022, 828 patent applications were filed and 485 were granted. The MedTech industry was already growing before the global pandemic, but after the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, the highest number of patent applications were recorded in 2021. With the European Patent Office (EPO) introducing the Unified Patent System in June 2023 which will simplify the patent processes across EU[17], the current IP scenario appears to be going in a positive direction. This could be prosperous not only for the prostheses industry, but the entire global patent landscape.

Economic Analysis:

Impact of Patents and Design Filings on the Revenues of the Market Leaders

A significant share of the global Prosthetics & Orthotics market is held by North America as of 2022. Multiple factors such as increased awareness amongst the older populations about cardiovascular and neurological disorders as well as awareness about sports injuries contribute to this success. Additionally, support from the Government and the ease of accessibility to high-quality medical facilities and attractive reimbursement policies play a vital role in its success.[18]

In 2018, North America led the myoelectric prosthetics market, owing to a convergence of trends such as greater acceptance of new technologies, an increase in the number and instances of Critical Limb Ischemia, and higher investment in the area[19].

The global prosthetics and orthotics market is categorized into four key regions, comprising North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Rest of the World (RoW). North America accounted market share of around 38% in 2021.[20] Due to the presence of established prosthetic makers in the United States, the demand and growth of the prosthetics and orthotics market has been growing at an unprecedented rate. Due to the better proficiency and skill of medical experts, many choose to get their treatment from U.S. However, it is expected that the prosthetics and orthotics market in Europe and APAC will pick up pace during years to come[21].

How patents and design filings contribute to a company’s revenue and profits

Patents are valuable intangible assets of a company. They protect a company’s innovation for a limited period of time (20 years) granting them exclusive rights and access to that invention. It is therefore clear why a company would need to protect their intellectual property or innovations and inventions. It gives them a competitive edge in the market can help make the business more efficient. There are multiple ways through which patents and design filings and protections benefit a company’s revenue.

  • Licensing and royalties: In an industry which thrives on innovation such as the medical technology and prosthetics industry, out-licensing patents is a very good way for companies to generate revenue. The income from out-licensing patented technologies may be in the form of royalties.
  • Exclusivity: By patenting the technologies and inventions, companies can prevent third parties from making, using, selling, offering for sale or importing the patented inventions in the country(ies) where the patent is granted. This gives a competitive edge to the companies and they are able to prevent their competitors from making the same or similar products. This is used as a defensive strategy by big companies to avoid litigation for the same.

One of the most impending legal risks that companies face is their inability to safeguard their intellectual property. E.g., Edwards Life Sciences in their 2022 form 10-K list[22] “a, Inability to protect our intellectual property, b, Inability to defend against intellectual property claims property claims from third parties” as their biggest threats under Legal, Compliance and Regulatory Risks.[23]

Many companies such as Edwards Life Sciences, Zimmer Biomet, Johnson and Johnson etc. have stated in their financial statements that, “Our inability to protect our intellectual property or failure to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of data or other sensitive company information, by cyber- attack or other event, could have a material adverse effect on our business.”[24] Patents therefore play a vital role in ensuring the success and competitiveness of a company.

  • Attracting investments and collaborations: When an invention is brought to the market to attract investors, it’s imperative that the invention is protected or else there is a risk of someone else copying it. In that case, an investor would not be interested in funding a project that can be done by other companies as well. Hence, patented and protected inventions serve as a measure of security which in turns boosts investments and collaborations.
  • Company valuation: Patents not only serve as an apparent protection for companies but also carry monetary value for companies in the form of intangible assets. For example, as of December 31, 2022, the total value of Intellectual Property Rights of Zimmer Biomet was $137.7 million.[25] In the year 2022, the gross value of intangible assets such as patents and trademarks  for Johnson & Johnson was $21,746 million.[26] For Medtronic Inc., in the year 2022 the gross carrying amount of purchased technologies and patents was $10,802 million and $473 million for trademarks and tradenames.[27]

The aforementioned statistics of some of the largest patent holders in the prosthetics industry shows how important it is for a company to safeguard their intellectual properties and technologies which can in turn yield huge revenues.

Revenue from Prosthetics and market leaders

In the previous section of this report, we had discussed the leading patent owners in the prosthetics industry. They are as follows:

  • Edwards Life Sciences: Edwards Life Sciences ranks #1 as the holder of maximum number of patents in this industry. Headquartered in Irvine, California, Edwards Life Sciences was founded in 1958 and specializes in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.[28] It’s net revenue in 2022 was $5,382.4 million (Form 10-K).
  • Medtronic Inc.: Ranking #2 in the list of global leaders in the prosthetics industry, Medtronic Inc. currently is the owner of 538 patents of prosthesis. Headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Medtronic is a global leader in developing and manufacturing healthcare technologies.[29] It’s net revenue in 2022 was $31,686 million (Form 10-K).
  • Zimmer Biomet: Zimmer Biomet was founded in 1927 and is headquartered in Indiana, United States of America.[30] It’s revenue in the year 2022 was $6,960 million (Form 10-K).
  • Johnson & Johnson: Johnson & Johnson is a multi-national corporation in the consumer health, pharmaceutical and MedTech industry. It was founded in 1886 and is headquartered in New Jersey, United States of America.[31] In 2022, it’s net sales were $94,943. (Form- 10K)
  • Stryker Corp: Stryker is one of the world’s leading medical technology companies and specialises in medical and surgical equipment, orthopaedics, neurotechnology and training and education.[32] It made a revenue of $18,449 million in 2022. (Form 10-K)
  • Abbott Laboratories: Headquartered in Illinois, United States, Abbott Laboratories is a multinational company founded in 1888. It primarily specializes in medical devices and healthcare. It’s revenue in 2022[33] was $43,653.00 million. (Form 10-K)
  • Cook Medical Group: Cook Medical is based in Bloomington, Indiana, United States and is primarily involved with the manufacturing of medical devices.[34]
  • Beijing Akec Medical Co Ltd.: Beijing AKEC Medical Company Limited develops, manufactures and sells orthopedic medical device products. The Company’s main product is artificial arthroplasty, which includes artificial knee joints, and artificial hip joints products. It’s net sales in 2022[35] were $73.31 million.[36]
  • Boston Scientific Corporation: Boston Scientific is an American Company that specialises in endoscopy, interventional cardiology, neuromodulation, peripheral interventions, rhythm management, urology and pelvic health.[37] It’s annual revenue in 2022 was $12,682.00 million. (Form 10-K)
  • Otto Bock Healthcare GMBH: Otto Bock GMBH is world leader in the prosthetics industry and is based in Duderstadt, Germany. It specialises in orthopaedics, wheelchairs, exoskeletons and prosthetics. It’s annual revenue in 2022 was 1.3 billion euros.[38]

Revenue distribution in the prosthetics industry

Patent Rank Market Leaders (current owners) No. of Patents Net sales (in millions) [2022] Revenue from prosthetics (in millions) [2022] % revenue from prosthetics
1 Abbott Lab 285 $43,653.00 $14,687.00 33.64%
2 Johnson & Johnson 324 $94,943.00 $8,587.00 9.04%
3 Stryker Corp 294 $18,449.00 $7,838.00 42.48%
4 Boston Scientific Corp 160 $12,682.00 $7,705.00 60.76%
5 Medtronic Inc 538 $31,686.00 $5,908.00 18.65%
6 Zimmer Biomet Holding 344 $6,940.00 $4,673.20 67.34%
7 Edwards Life Sciences 557 $5,382.40 $3,634.30 67.52%
8 Otto Bock Healthcare GMBH 139 $1,445.60 $834.18 57.70%
9 Beijing Akec Medical Co Ltd 184 $73.31 $73.31 100.00%
10 Cook Group Inc 245 $2,236.00    

Many of these companies specialize primarily on developing and manufacturing prosthetic devices such as Zimmer Biomet Holding, Beijing Akec Medical Co. Ltd. And Otto Bock Healthcare GMBH. Other companies such as Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic Inc, etc. specialize in many other fields of medical sciences.

S. No. Market Leaders (current owners) No. of Patents Net sales (in millions) [2022] Revenue from prosthetics (in millions)  [2022]
1 Edwards Life Sciences 557 $5,382.40 $3634.3
2 Medtronic Inc 538 $31,686.00 $5,908
3 Zimmer Biomet Holding 344 $6,940.00 $4,673
4 Johnson & Johnson 324 $94,943.00 $8,857
5 Stryker Corp 294 $18,449.00 $7,838
6 Abbott Lab 285 $43,653.00 $14,687
7 Cook Group 245 $2,336  
8 Beijing Akec Medical Co Ltd 184 $73.31 $73.31
9 Boston Scientific Corp 160 $12,682.00 $7,705
10 Otto Bock Healthcare GMBH 139 $1,445.6 $834.18

It is observed that Abbott Laboratories that rank #6 globally in the prosthesis patent market yielded the maximum revenue of $14,687 million in the year 2022. The prostheses products constitute nearly 1/3rd of the company’s total revenue. Second in the list is Johnson & Johnson, making $8,587 million from medical devices and prostheses alone. This sector only makes up 9% of the total revenue of the company. Stryker Corp places third with 42% of their revenue coming from prostheses valued at $7,838 million. Boston Scientific Corp is a close fourth after Stryker Corp, closing in at $7,705 million which is nearly 61% of their total revenue. Medtronic Inc, despite being the second largest prostheses patent holder places 5th on the list of revenue from prostheses which constitutes 18% of their total sales. Interestingly, Edwards Life Sciences which owns the largest number of patents in this industry places 6th on the list of prostheses revenues despite prostheses constituting 67.5% of their total revenue. Otto Bock Healthcare GMBH, the world leader in prostheses design filings places 8th on the revenue list. Beijing Akec Medical Co. and Zimmer Biomet are close competitors as well.

Contribution of Patents and Designs for the Market Leaders

As stated in section 4.1 of this report, patents and designs play a huge role in ensuring the success of a company. Patents, designs, trademarks are usually listed as intangible assets in a company’s financials, but they are assets, nonetheless. Patents and designs also indirectly increase the monetary value of companies. They do this by increasing the goodwill and trust of consumers in the respective companies, they can be used in out-licensing of patented technologies and enabling organizations and companies to enforce their rights.

  • Edwards Life Sciences:

In Edwards Life Sciences form 10-K for the year 2022, it is observed that the company invested $205.5 million in patents, which are finite-lived intangible assets. This is an increment from 2021 by about $20 million. The net carrying value of the patents at the end of 2022 is $20.5 million, about thirteen times more than 2021. This indicates that Edwards Life Sciences understands the importance of investing in patents and safeguarding their intellectual property which will yield great revenues in the future.

  • Medtronic Inc.

For Medtronic Inc., in the year 2022 the gross carrying amount of purchased technologies and patents was $10,802 million and $473 million for trademarks and tradenames. The high investment in purchasing technology and patents is highly beneficial for the company as it can help them expand their existing product/innovation line and contribute in research and development.

  • Zimmer Biomet Holdings

Zimmer Biomet’s intangible assets such as Intellectual Property Rights are valued at $137.7 million and trademarks and tradenames at $711 million. This is a decrease from 2021 owing to the increase in amortization of the intangible assets. Trademarks and tradenames constitute 14% of the total value of intangible assets of 2022.

  • Johnson & Johnson

There is a positive trend in the patents investments from 2021 resulting in greater values for patents and trademarks. Johnson & Johnson is a multinational corporation with maximum focus on consumer health products, therefore It realizes the importance of protecting its innovations in this incredibly competitive industry.

For the global leaders, protecting their technologies is extremely vital. Stryker Co. in 2022 had intangible assets (patents + trademarks) worth $251 million. Not only do patents ensure security but the mere investment in patenting technologies is an important factor to consider while ascertaining the company’s commitment to its successful future

Linking the Revenue to Patents and Designs

The trends are very inconsistent and there is no linearity observed between the patents filed and the revenue generated. Edwards Life Sciences, the largest patent holder generated minimal revenue from prosthesis. This could mean that the company has filed multiple patents to avoid other companies to use the same technology, or to increase their brand value and marketing without any actual utility of those patents. Further, these patents could be utilised in the future to generate larger revenues.

The annual revenue of Edwards Life Sciences is also in the lower half of the top 10 companies which could signify that the company is not investing the right amount of resources or facilities to yield the complete potential of their prostheses patents. This could be a risk to the business as 2/3rd of the revenue is generated by prostheses thereby making it an integral part of their business.

Abbott Labs have made the most revenue from their prosthetic devices with nearly 34% of their business coming from this sector. This is a sharp contrast from Edwards’ financials which hold almost double the number of patents and yields almost one-fifth the revenue of Abbott Labs from prostheses.

Johnson & Johnson has the highest annual revenue amongst all companies and second highest revenue from prostheses. Prostheses contribute only 9% of the company’s revenue and yet places second. Johnson & Johnson does not specialise in prostheses as compared to its other competitors such as Otto Bock Healthcare and yet performed exceptionally well.

There is also a disparity in Medtronic Inc.’s prostheses patents and revenue generated. 18% of Medtronic’s revenue comes from prostheses.

Litigation in the Prosthetic Devices Industry

After the COVID-19 global pandemic, the MedTech industry has becoming increasingly relevant. Recent patent filings have been primarily focused on information and communications technology (ICT) specially adapted for medical diagnosis such as point-of-care devices, wearables, and remote monitoring systems such as telemedicine, medical simulation, or medical data mining followed by surgical robots.[39] With Artificial Intelligence (AI) becoming extremely prevalent in almost all sectors and industries, its introduction in the MedTech and especially prosthetics industry is notable. Recent technologies with the help of AI are aiming to revolutionise the current models of prosthetic devices. In built AI systems in the devices will learn the movements of the functioning body part which they will then remember and replicate. This will then be installed in the phantom body part as a prosthetic device. This does away with the previously used myoelectric and body connected prosthetic devices.

With an increase in innovation and patent filings in this industry, there have been litigations and oppositions as well.

Disputes in the Industry

In the last ten years, there have been multiple oppositions and litigations in the prosthetics industry. Some of these involve the biggest players in the industry such as Edwards Life Sciences, Zimmer Biomet, Cook Medical, etc. Listed below are the legal proceedings and disputes in the industry amongst the biggest players. Some notable disputes are as follows:

  • Edwards Life Sciences v. Abbott Laboratories

In 2019, Abbott Laboratories alleged Edwards’ transcatheter valve repair system Pascal infringes on its MitraClip patents in lawsuits filed in the U.S. and several European markets.[40]  In 2020, Edwards Life Sciences agreed to pay Abbott $368 million upfront to settle disputes over patents for transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve repair products, plus roughly $100 million in royalties through mid-2024.[41] This led to Edwards Life Sciences spending approximately $405 million on intellectual property related litigation settlements in 2020.[42]

At present, Edwards Life Sciences is in a legal proceeding led by Aortic Innovations LLC in 2021 alleging that Edwards’ SAPIEN 3 Ultra product infringes certain of its patents.[43]

  • Stryker Corp v. Conformis

Stryker Corp acquired Wright Medical in November 2021. Conformis alleged that many patient-specific devices made by Wright Medical infringed upon their patents. In this dispute, Stryker Corp had to pay $15 million to Conformis.[44]

  • NuVasiv v. Medtronic

The lawsuit was initially filed in 2008 regarding spinal products, and in 2016 both companies agreed mutually to settle the lawsuit for $40 million paid by NuVasiv to Medtronic Inc.

Opposed Patents

There have been multiple oppositions to patent applications and grants in the last ten years. Most of the oppositions have been recorded from the European Patent Office, followed by United States, South Korea and Germany.

  • EP898943B1: Dental Prosthetic Part[45]

Applicants: WIELAND DENTAL & TECHNIK GMBH [DE]

On 2004-08-12, opposition was filed by DENTALES SERVICE ZENTRUM GMBH & CO.KG post-grant.

  • EP3400908B1: Artificial Valve Prostheses[46]

Applicants: COOK MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC [US]

On 2021-04-28, opposition was filed by NEOVASC TIARA INC. in Germany after the patent was granted.

  • EP2982337A1: Paravalvular Leak Detection, Sealing, and Prevention[47]

Applicants: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES PVT INC [US]

On 2021-05-25, opposition was filed in Germany. On 2021-06-29, opposition was filed in Finland by ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. and NEOVASC TIARA INC.

On 2021-06-30, both companies filed oppositions.

On 2023-06-30, date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded. This was the latest legal development in this case.

  • EP2962726A1: System for excitation of phantom sensations[48]

Applicants: MEIER-KOLL ALFRED [DE]

On 2021-08-03, opposition against patent was filed in Germany by SAPHENUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY GMBH.

On 2023-06-03, opposition was rejected.

  • EP2720648B8: Femoral Component for a knee prosthesis with improved articular characteristics[49]

Applicants: ZIMMER INC [US]

On 2016-06-08, opposition was filed by SLINGSBY PARTNERS LLP. The appeal procedure was closed on 2021-11-17. On 2022-09-13, the patent was revoked following opposition.

  • US9907561B2: Ankle replacement and method[50]

Original Assignee: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECH INC (US)

Current owners: STRYKER CORP (upon acquiring WRIGHT MEDICAL), WRIGHT MEDICAL GROUP NV.

  • KR20180122237A: Apparatus for exercising prostatic hyperplasia by neural stimulation[51]

Applicants: PARK JEONG HOON (KR)

On 2019-01-31, the decision to refuse the application was passed.

Legal status: Inactive-rejected/ refused/ suspended

Corporations and companies expend certain sums of money per annum for settlements to counter oppositions and litigation claims. Many of these patents cease to exist  due to fierce oppositions.  The patents listed above are a few of many oppositions filed in the last ten years and is not exhaustive.

Litigations

While there have been many patent oppositions, the litigations in this industry are also many in number. There have been a total of 20 litigations in the last ten years, some of which have costed big corporations huge sums of money owing to patent infringements. Some of these have been listed in section 5.1. 14 out of these 20 litigations have been from US patents and the rest are from China and Japan.

  • US8623077B2: Apparatus for replacing cardiac valve.

This patent was published on 07-Jan-2014 by Medtronic Inc. A petition was filed by Edwards Life Sciences in 2014 in the United States Patent and Trademark office before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The petitioner, Edwards Life Sciences requested for a review of certain sections of the publication filed by Medtronic Inc. due to non-distinctness of their existing products. The final decision has not been decided yet.[52]

There have been multiple litigations between these two companies in the past regarding transcatheter aortic valve replacement systems. In 2010, a $73 million  judgement in favour of Edwards was regarding similar products. Another case’s recent ruling in January 2014 for nearly $394 million in favour of Edwards in a case against Medtronic.[53]

  • US9393110B2: Prosthetic Heart Valve.

This patent was published on 19-July-2016 by Edwards Life Sciences who is the current owner. Edwards was the plaintiff that alleged that the defendant Meril Inc was attempting to capitalize on Edwards’ success by infringing  multiple Edwards’ patents, designs, innovations and trademarks. Although both corporations had settled their dispute by paying settlement money, a court ruling dated May 18th,  2022 held in favour of the plaintiffs and against Edwards. [54]

  • US9492280B2: Multiple-cam, posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis.

This patent was published on 15-Nov-2016 by MEDIDEA LLC. In the same year, the plaintiffs MedIdea brought a case against the defendants DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. for patent infringement. The United States District Court of Massachusetts  ruled in favour of the defendants DePuy orthopaedics and against MEDIDEA LLC. The patent is currently terminated.[55]

JP2018519868A is a litigated patent for palm unit for artificial hands by ハイファイブプロ エーエス,  a Japanese   company. Some Chinese patents are as follows: CN104207863B (Introduce the total joint replacement prostheses of torque), CN102098984B (Anchoring of tendon f biceps of prosthetic device under arthroscope), etc.

Mergers and Acquisitions

There have been many significant acquisitions in for the top players in the industry.

  • Edwards Life Sciences

Edwards Life Sciences did not acquire any companies in 2022. Its latest acquisitions include Corvia Medical in 2019 for $35 million and CAS Medical Systems in the same year for $100 million. The largest acquisition done by Edwards was in the year 2015 when it acquired CardiAQ Valve Technologies, Inc. for $400 million. Sector-wise, 77% of their total acquisitions come from the medical products sector, followed by life sciences (8%). Totally, they have acquired 13 companies (add-on acquisitions and divestitures). [56]

  • Medtronic Inc.

Medtronic Inc. has acquired a total of 62 companies. It’s latest acquisition is of EOFlow (2023) which is a South-Korean medical device company for $738 million.[57] In 2022, it acquired Massachusetts-based Affera, a medical technology company specialising in innovations related to cardiac arrhythmia for $925 million. Medtronic’s biggest acquisition till date is of Covidien PLC for $42.9 billion in 2014.

Sector-wise, 58 companies acquired are from the medical products sector (88%). 7% is from healthcare services and 2% is from life sciences.[58]

  • Zimmer Biomet Holdings:

Zimmer Biomet Holdings has acquired 24 companies. It’s largest acquisition was of Biomet Inc. for $13.3 billion in 2014. It’s latest acquisitions include A&E Medical Corp in 2020 for $250 million.[59] In 2022, it had reached a definitive agreement to acquire Embody Inc. for $155 million and up to an additional $120 million subject to achieving future regulatory and commercial milestones over a three year period.[60]

  • Johnson & Johnson:

Johnson & Johnson has acquired a total of 41 companies. It acquired Abiomed in 2022 for $16.6 billion. It’s largest acquisition was of Actelion Ltd., a biopharmaceutical company for $30 billion in the year 2017. In 2011, it acquired Synthes Inc. for $19.3 billion. 39% of the companies acquired by Johnson & Johnson are from the medical products industry. A close second is the life sciences industry (37%) followed by consumer products (12%) and digital media (5%). [61]

  • Stryker Corp:

Stryker Corp has acquired a total of 44 companies. It’s most recent acquisitions include Vocera in 2022 for $3 billion and Gauss Surgical in 2021. It is to acquire Cerus Endovascular in 2023. It’s largest acquisition was in 2019 when it acquired Wright Medical Group N.V. for $5.4 billion. It’s highest acquisitions have been in the medical products sector (75%), followed by healthcare services (14%) and manufacturing (7%).[62]

  • Abbott Laboratories:

Abbott Laboratories acquired Cardiovascular Systems Inc. in February 2023 for $890 million. Their total number of acquisitions are 34. Their biggest add-on acquisition was of St. Jude Medical Inc. in 2016 for $25 billion. 56% of these acquisitions are from the medical products industry, followed by Life Science (32%) and information technology (3%).[63]

  • Boston Scientific:

Boston Scientific Corp has acquired a total of 62 companies with its most recent acquisition being Acotec in 2022. Its biggest acquisition was of Guidant Corp. in 2006 for $24.6 billion. 77% of their acquisitions are in the medical products industry, followed by health care services (13%) and life sciences (8%). [64]   

The Future

The future of the orthotics and prosthetics industry looks promising. This report has substantiated this point through analysing various patent trends and industry analysis. It is expected that the orthotics market will grow significantly in terms of revenue in the next ten years. Orthotics is forecasted to grow at the highest CAGR of over 5.9% from 2023 to 2033.[65]

As discussed earlier, cardiovascular, neural and bone-related ailments have increased in the projected period therefore increasing the demand for orthotics and prosthetics. Additionally, diabetes-related amputations are also becoming common globally, further increasing market growth. Orthotics can be used in conjunction with physiotherapy procedures such as muscular training and stretching, gait and balance retraining, and reach and grip tactics to help patients achieve their goals[66].

The USA is expected to account for a significant market of US$ 3.7 Billion by the end of 2033.[67] This can be attributed to the fact that most of the major players in this industry such as Edwards Life Sciences, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson hail from the U.S. The proficiency and skill of the region’s medical specialists and doctors have motivated people from other locations to travel there for prosthetic and orthotics treatments. According to the National Limb Loss Information Centre, approximately 1.7 million people in the USA have lost a limb for whatever reason.[68] According to some estimates, one out of every 200 people in the USA has had a limb amputated.[69]

The market in the UK is expected to reach a valuation of US$ 522 Million by 2033, growing at a CAGR of over 5% from 2023 to 2033. During the forecast period, the market is projected to witness an absolute dollar opportunity of US$ 218 Million.[70]

In Japan, the market is projected to gross an absolute dollar opportunity of US$ 320 Million from2023 to 2033, growing at a CAGR of 8.3%. By 2033, the market is projected to reach US$ 583Million.[71]

The Indian scenario is different. Due to the economic disparities amongst the people of India, the affordability of prosthetics is the biggest challenge in this industry. High-end prosthetic devices cost lakhs and the cheaper alternatives offer limited functionality. According to reports, India has more than half a million amputees, with tens of thousands added to the amputee population every year.[72] However, this is expected to change with Indian prostheses start-ups such as Robo-Bionics, Chetan Meditech, etc. making great strides in this field.

Conclusions

Amputations are done on an estimated 158,000 people in the USA each year, with the absolute number of amputations growing. For upper-limb amputation, reported rates of prosthesis use range from 27% to 56%, while lower-limb amputation rates range from 49% to 95%. The industry is expanding due to the rising desire for custom-made foot orthotics[73].

This report sheds light on the current IP scenario of the prostheses industry. The patenting trends are on an increase especially after the COVID-19 global pandemic, indicating a positive trend. However, we have also observed that the number of patents filed by a company is not necessarily proportional to the revenue generated. Amongst the largest patent holders, there is a need to maximise the potential from these patents to maximise revenues.

There has also been an uptick in the number of design filings, with several Indian companies becoming relevant in this context. Geographically, the United States dominates both patent and design filings from the trends observed in the last ten years.

Technological advancements have been accelerated in the last decade. This has led to the development of Artificial Intelligence-based prostheses amongst others. This has the potential to completely revolutionarise the industry. Some other key developments include the advent of neuromuscular signal processing.

3D printing is another important driver in the development and manufacturing of prosthetic devices. It plays an incredibly vital role in simplifying the process of creating customised prosthetic limbs and devices.  The traditional orthotic solutions are generic therefore the boosters of this industry are the customisable prosthetics that provide patients more comfort. 3D printing aids this.

Authors:  Prof (Dr) Anindya Sircar (DPIIT Chair Professor; NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad, India) and Ms Bhavya Sharma (BBA LLB Student, Jindal Global Law School, Sonipet, India)

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607 

What is Technology Transfer?

Author: Pooja Bhatia, Author and CEO, Inoberry LLC.

What is Technology Transfer?

Have you ever wondered where our world would be without innovation, knowledge, skills and expertise? Would we have vaccines protecting us from diseases including COVID? Technology transfer has been happening since time immemorial in various ways from generation to generation.

The importance of technology transfer can be illustrated by the indelible ink that has been used in elections for years. It was developed in the CSIR-National Physical Lab, patented by NRDC and licensed to Mysore Paints and Varnishes Limited (Earlier called Mysore Lac and Paints Limited).In the year 2022, DRDO reported that they have signed 1464 technology transfer agreements.

Technology transfer offers the following advantages:

  1. Knowledge dissemination
  2. Fosters innovation and economic development
  3. Promotes practical application of scientific discoveries.
  4. Competitiveness at national and global level
  5. Job Creation
  6. Capacity building
  7. Attracts investment
  8. Bridges the gap between research and real-world solution
  9. Effective utilization of valuable knowledge and technologies
  10. Benefits the society by offering solutions to its problems.

Technology Transfer is a complex process involving a number of steps to transfer knowledge, skills, innovation and technologies.  Technology transfer can be of various types. The most common form of technology transfer is publications in journals, industry-academia collaboration and joint ventures. The following are other types of technology transfer:

  1. Technology development and transfer: Creating solution to address the given problem statement provided by a company to another company or institutions and then transferring it.
  2. Know-how transfer: When knowledge is transferred with or without associated IPRs, it is called as Know-how transfer.
  3. Licensing: It is a process of allowing a third party or third parties other than the owner of the IPR to use, make or sell products or use or make or sell products using the process protected.
  4. Assignment: It is a process of assigning rights of one party to other party to use, make or sell the IP protected product, process or innovation.
  5. Spin-off formation: It is another form of technology transfer where IPR and/or technology and know how is licensed to a newly created startup or company based on the institutional technology or IPR.
  6. Material transfer: is a form of technology transfer where IPR associated or non-IPR associated material is transferred for further testing, evaluation or research.

Technology transfer is a process involving the following steps:

  1. Market assessment
  2. Marketing
  3. Deal Negotiation
  4. Signing of Agreement

Each step of technology transfer requires skills and expertise to move it ahead.
Read more on the skills required in the upcoming write up.
Original Published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-technology-transfer-bhatia-vasaikar-clp-rttp-patent-agent-awfzc
Infographics, Summary Video and Listenable related to these articles available at Dhvaani
Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607

Drafting a Patent Specification: Important Considerations

A patent specification is a technical-legal document having a written description of the invention, along with the manner and process of making and using the invention. The patent specification must include the novel and inventive steps of the invention. It must be clear and concise to enable understanding of the invention to any person skilled in the art. Under the Indian patent law, a patent specification defines the boundaries of exclusive rights granted to the inventor.

Before drafting a patent specification, it is highly important to consider several aspects to make sure that the invention is legally protected. The key points before drafting a patent specification are listed below.

  1. Understanding ‘What’ is the invention.        

A patent specification must meet the legal requirements in the country in which the patent is to be obtained. The patent attorney can help in the preparation of the patent specification based on the disclosure provided by the inventor. Thus, providing the complete disclosure of the invention to the patent attorney is highly important to make the patent specification preparation easier.

It is also critical to determine if the invention is patentable and to determine if it can be protected. An invention must have patentable subject matter to be eligible for patent protection. The invention must be new, inventive and must have a utility. The invention must not have any prior use before the invention is made public. It is important to know what can and cannot be patented. If the information related to the invention is publicly disclosed, one cannot get a patent for that invention. Therefore, a search of all previous public disclosures should be conducted to identify the prior arts including foreign patents and publications.

The patent specification requires a high level of detail and the patent attorney uses these details to prepare a detailed disclosure of the invention. The patent specification, whether a provisional or complete specification, must present the subject matter of the invention in a clear manner where the disclosure can portray the method of making and using the invention to any person skilled in the art.

The level of detail in the patent specification must demonstrate clearly that the inventor or the applicant is in possession of the invention in the form of the best example. The invention can have any number of applications, which might not be in practice or be implemented at the time of filing the patent application. Importantly, the complete technical disclosure of the invention, along with the expertise in defending the invention during prosecution increases the chances of getting the grant for the patent.

The complete patent specification includes claims that define the key technical aspects and boundaries of the invention for which protection is sought. It is important to construct the claims clearly and precisely, to avoid serious objections during patent prosecution stages. Clearly drafted claims are essential as the claims define the scope and set the boundaries of the patent rights.

  1. Understanding ‘Why’ to file a patent                

It is necessary to understand why we must file a patent application, before drafting the patent specification.

It is important to understand why to file a patent application, as once a patent application is filed, it acts as a prior art and dissuades the other inventors from trying to patent the same invention in the future. Whether the patent is issued, published or a pending application, the document acts as a public document.

The reasons for filing a patent application might be to protect the invention from competitors trying to enter the market and to stop the infringement and gain control over the market. The reason can also be securing the exclusive rights over the invention, which can be used for licensing or transferring the rights of the invention, and many more. A patent grant can increase the negotiating power of the inventor with the competitors and licensees; nowadays, filing a patent application is considered necessary by potential investors or businesses looking to acquire your invention.

  1. Understanding ‘Where’ the invention is to be filed.                          

The inventor must access the market for their invention to determine where to file for the protection of the invention. This requires the inventor or the applicant to study the market related to their invention and seek protection in countries with high demand and value.

If the product or method developed by the inventor is going to revolutionize the related industry, then it is highly critical to prevent their competitors from copying their invention or imitating their invention for a low-priced product. Thus, there is a need for filing a patent application. But patents are territorial rights, meaning the rights for a patent is only applicable in the region where the patent application is filed, which creates a need for foreign patent protection. Foreign patent protection requires the inventor to file a patent application in all the countries where there is a good market for their invention, and it might deter competitors from infringing, but pursuing it comes at a greater cost.

Upon receiving the complete technical disclosure of the invention from the inventors or the applicant, the patent attorney will start preparing a patent specification draft. The patent attorney has to carefully select the terms used in the patent specification, to avoid limiting the scope of the invention. Use of such terms might lead to undesirable consequences during patent prosecution. During patent prosecution, generally, the claims protecting the key aspects of the invention can be amended to redefine the scope of the invention. Still, the patent specification is rarely amended to a greater extent. Thus, drafting the patent specification is highly critical. Taking all the above points into account, a clear and concise document has to be created, as the inventor or the applicant gets only one opportunity to explain their invention.

  1. Conclusion

Patent specification drafting is a complex procedure but can be done precisely with the help of a patent attorney. Considering the complexities of the Indian patent law and rules, the patent attorney considers all the strategies and considerations before drafting a patent specification. A thoughtfully drafted patent specification creates valuable intellectual property and avoids unnecessary time and cost consumed during patent prosecution.

Author: Megha S Nadiger, Origiin IP Solutions LLP

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607

IP Reimbursement Schemes in Karnataka

IP registration is very beneficial for many companies as it gives the owner the exclusive rights over their IP assets through which they can gain profits. In order to boost IP Registration in the country, there are multiple Government schemes available, using which IP expenses may be reimbursed, some of the being as follows, especially for the companies registered in Karnataka:

  1. Scheme 1- By Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises

This Scheme offers legal and intellectual property filing support including patents, trademarks, copyrights, designs, geographical indications (GI) etc. The programme also provides IP advisory, consultation, Patentability Searches, Technology Gap Analyses and IP commercialisation through establishment of Intellectual Property Facilitation Centres (IPFCs) across the country.

Eligibility Criteria

Under Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, IP reimbursement application can only be filed by start-ups who are registered under MSME (Udhyam registration).

If not registered the Registration of MSME (Udhyam registration) can be done with link given: https://udyamregistration.gov.in/Government-India/Ministry-MSME-registration.htm

In order to get Udhyam registration, the required documents are:

  • Pan card
  • Aadhaar card
  • Business address proof
  • Bank statement
  • GSTIN
  • Certificate of incorporation or partnership deed

Benefits of the scheme

  • Will enhance the awareness of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) amongst the MSMEs and to encourage creative intellectual endeavour in Indian economy;
  • Will help take suitable measures for the protection of ideas, technological innovation and knowledge-driven business strategies developed by the MSMEs for their commercialization and effective utilization of IPR tools.
  • Will provide appropriate support and facilities for the protection and commercialisation of IP for the benefit of the MSME Sector.
  • Offers assistance to Small and Medium Enterprises with effective use of IPR tools for technology development, market and business promotion, and enhancement of competition

Documents required for IP Reimbursement:

The following documents are required for MSME IP reimbursement:

  • Application form: This can be downloaded from the website of the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME).
  • Udyog Aadhaar Memorandum (UAM): This is a registration certificate for MSMEs.
  • Copy of the patent/trademark/GI registration certificate: This is proof that the MSME has successfully registered its intellectual property.
  • Statement of expenditure: This is a detailed account of the expenses incurred by the MSME during the registration process.
  • Receipt/proof of payment: This is proof that the MSME has paid the registration fees. Any query regarding the scheme, can be sent to mayapandey.dgca@gov.in

Reimbursement given:

S. No. Item Maximum Financial Assistance
1. Foreign Patent Rs. 5.00 lakh
2. Domestic Patent Rs. 1.00 lakh
3. GI Registration Rs. 2.00 lakh
4. Design Registration Rs. 0.15 lakh
5. Trademark Rs. 0.10 lakh

Links to apply for IP Reimbursement:

  1. Patent Reimbursement link-https://my.msme.gov.in/mymsme/Reg/COM_IprGopAppForm.aspx
  2. Trademark Reimbursement link -https://my.msme.gov.in/mymsme/Reg/COM_IprTradeAppForm.aspx
  3. Design Reimbursement link- https://my.msme.gov.in/mymsme/Reg/COM_IprDesignAppForm.aspx
  1. Scheme 2- SIP-EIT (International Patents only)

The Department of Electronics and Information Technology (DeiTY) has launched a scheme entitled “Support for International Patent Protection in E&IT (SIP-EIT)” to provide financial support to MSMEs and Technology Start-Up units for international patent filing. SIP-EIT Scheme captures the growth opportunities in the area of information technology and electronics. This scheme encourages indigenous innovation and also recognise the value and capabilities of global IP. In this article, we look at the SIP-EIT Scheme in detail.

Benefits of the Scheme

  • Financial support is provided for international filing in Information Communication Technologies and Electronics sector.
  • The Reimbursement limit has been set to the maximum of Rs. 15 Lakhs per invention or 50% of the total charges incurred in filing and processing of a patent application, whichever is lesser.
  • This support scheme can be applied at any stage of international patent filing by the applicant. However, the reimbursement will only be applicable to expenditures incurred from the date of acceptance of a complete application by DeiTY subject to the approval of the competent authority.

Eligibility Criteria

In general, to qualify for the SIP-EIT scheme, the companies should fall under any of the following criteria:

  • The company must be registered with the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 of Government of India.
  • The applicant must be a registered company following the Companies Act of Government of India and must fulfil the investment limits in plant and machinery or equipment as defined in the MSMED Act 2006 as amended from time to time
  • A company to be a registered Software Technology Park unit and its amount of investments in PME must be lower than the limits specified under the MSMED Act, 2006.
  • A company must be a technology incubation startup or an enterprise or located in an incubation centre/park and registered as a company. A startup must also have a certification from the incubation centre/park in case it is located on such premises. These companies, too, have to meet the investment limits for PME defined under the MSMED Act, 2006

Documents required

The applicants must furnish the following documents along with the Application Form to apply for the SIP-EIT Scheme:

  1. In case you are an MSME unit under MSME Development Act 2006, then upload scanned copy of Registration Certificate in *.pdf format, Or
  2. In case you are a Company under Companies Act of Government of India then upload scanned copy of Registration Certificate in *.pdf format, Or
  3. In case you are a registered Software Technology Park of India unit, then upload scanned copy of such Registration, Or
  4. In case you are a Technology Incubation Enterprise/Startup and registered as a company, then upload a scanned copy of Registration Certificate issued by a competent authority in *.pdf format and a certification from the incubation centre/park in *.pdf format.
  5. Upload a scanned copy of last audited Balance Sheet in *.pdf format
  6. If Applicant is an employee or Member of Board of Directors, it has to be substantiated by Documentary proof and uploaded in *.pdf format
  7. Upload the copy of product brochure if any.
  8. Upload the copy of latest Annual Report, if any.
  9. Copy of official filing receipt (OFR) with Indian Patent Office or copy of waiver under section 39 of Indian Patent Act in case of patent application filed in countries outside India.
  10. If you have applied for PCT/ Paris Convention or Direct International Filing, then upload the copy of proof of the same in *.pdf format (A consolidated copy can suffice)
  11. Attach the copy of technical write-up of invention duly fill it up as per the format of technical writeup and upload the same in *.pdf format
  12. Upload the patent search report in *.pdf format
  13. Attach a duly filled scanned copy of Details for transfer of e-payments, as per the format and upload the same in *.pdf format.
  14. Attach a scanned copy of Declaration form duly signed and sealed as per the format and upload the same in *.pdf format.
  15. A statement by the auditor of the enterprise that they fulfil the criteria of investment in plant and machinery or investment in capital equipment (as the case may be) as stipulated in the MSMED Act 2006. Upload the same in *.pdf format.

Reimbursement given:

The Reimbursement limit has been set to the maximum of Rs. 15 Lakhs per invention or 50% of the total charges incurred in filing and processing of a patent application, whichever is lesser.

The applicants can visit the DeiTY website or ICT-IPR portal to apply for the SIP-EIT SchemeThen the applicant has to fill out the application form in a prescribed format online. After completing, upload all the specified records along with the application form. The recommended applications will then be processed finally at DeiTY for the approval. Any query regarding the scheme, can be sent to ipr@meity.gov.in

The link to apply for SIP-EIT scheme is as below:

https://www.ict-ipr.in/sipeit/login

  1. Scheme 3-Karnataka Patent Reimbursement Incentive for Startups

The policy defines that the cost of filing and prosecution of patent application will be reimbursed to the incubated startup companies subject to a limit of Rs. 2 lakh (0.2 million) per Indian patent awarded. For awarded foreign patents on a single subject matter, up to Rs. 10 lakhs (1 Million) would be reimbursed. The reimbursement will be done in 2 stages, i.e., 75% after the patent is filed and the balance 25% after the patent is granted.

Reimbursement given:

Domestic patents 2 lakhs
Foreign patents 10 lakhs

Reimbursement in 2 stages 75% when patent is filed and 25% when patent granted

Eligibility criteria

The eligibility Criteria to avail of the benefit of the reimbursement on the filing of a patent application are as follows:

  • The applicant should be a Startup registered with the Karnataka Startup Cell with a valid Karnataka Startup Cell registration number
  • Only patents that have been filed by a startup within the validity of the Karnataka Startup Policy will be eligible to claim this reimbursement

Documents Required

The documents required for the Karnataka Patent Reimbursement Incentive for Startups are as follows:

  • KBITS registration number
  • Application Form
  • A copy of the patent filed at the appropriate authority
  • Certificate of Patent Grant from Patent Office
  • A detailed statement of expenses incurred towards the Patent Registration along with the copies of invoices & receipts from the patent authority and legal counsel as applicable
  • All Invoices submitted by the appropriate Patent Authority towards Government fees and legal agents
  • The certificate of Patent with a valid serial number must be furnished and valid form 27 to be enclosed.
  • The reimbursement amount will be released/disbursed on the seniority basis depending upon the Budget allotment of the State Government. Any query regarding the scheme, can be sent to startupcel@karnataka.gov.in

The link to apply for this scheme is as below: https://www.missionstartupkarnataka.org/incentives?patent-reimbursement incentives?en#

 Compiled by: Ritesh Warikallamath, BA, LLB from Christ University, Bangalore

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607

Important Clauses of a Business Contract

Business contracts serve as legally binding agreements outlining terms for transactions like partnerships, leases, and licensing deals. Within these contracts, clauses specify each party’s rights, obligations, and remedies, clarifying terms and managing risks. While contract clauses vary, certain essential ones, such as dispute resolution, indemnification, warranties, termination, limitations of liability, and confidentiality, are universally vital. These clauses define obligations, safeguard interests, and ensure contract enforceability.

In this article, we explore the significance and nuances of these important clauses within business contracts.

Important Contract Clauses

  1. Indemnification Clause

The indemnification clause is a cornerstone of business contracts, allocating risks and protecting parties from potential legal liabilities. It outlines the procedures for compensating one party (the indemnified party) for specific expenses or losses incurred due to actions or omissions of the other party (the indemnifying party).

By clearly delineating responsibilities and liabilities, this clause helps maintain clarity and accountability in contractual relationships. It enables parties to negotiate and agree upon acceptable levels of risk, providing a framework for resolving disputes and minimizing the potential for costly litigation.

  1. Force Majeure Clause 

Incorporating a force majeure clause is essential for addressing unforeseeable events or circumstances that may hinder the performance of contractual obligations. This clause typically excuses parties from fulfilling their contractual duties in the event of “acts of God” such as natural disasters, wars, or government actions beyond their control.

By specifying the conditions under which performance may be suspended or excused, the force majeure clause helps mitigate the risks associated with unpredictable events, ensuring fairness and equity in contractual arrangements.

  1. Limitations on Liability Clause

The limitations on the liability clause play a crucial role in defining the extent of financial responsibility each party assumes under the contract. It sets forth the maximum amount of damages or losses for which a party can be held liable in the event of breaches, negligence, or other contractual violations.

By capping potential liabilities and specifying the types of damages recoverable, this clause provides certainty and predictability, reducing the risk of excessive financial exposure and facilitating smoother dispute resolution processes.

  1. Confidentiality Clause

Including a confidentiality clause is essential for safeguarding sensitive information and proprietary data exchanged between parties during the course of the contract. This clause imposes obligations on both parties to maintain the confidentiality of confidential information and restrict its use or disclosure to authorised individuals.

By establishing clear guidelines for handling confidential information, the confidentiality clause helps protect trade secrets, intellectual property, and other valuable assets, fostering trust and preserving competitive advantage.

  1. Copyright Clause

The copyright clause protects the contracting parties’ intellectual property rights, particularly in transactions involving creating or using copyrighted materials. It explicitly states the ownership rights, usage permissions, and restrictions related to copyrighted works exchanged or developed under the contract.

By acknowledging and respecting the copyright ownership of creative works, this clause helps prevent unauthorized use or infringement, ensuring compliance with intellectual property laws and preserving the integrity of original creations.

  1. Termination Clause

The termination clause outlines the conditions and procedures for terminating the contract before its natural expiration. It may specify various grounds for termination, such as breach of contract, insolvency, or mutual agreement between the parties. Additionally, the clause often includes provisions regarding notice periods, termination fees, and post-termination obligations.

By providing a clear mechanism for ending the contract, the termination clause enhances certainty, reduces ambiguity, and protects the interests of both parties in the event of unforeseen circumstances or dissatisfaction with the contractual relationship.

  1. Dispute Resolution Clause

The dispute resolution clause is a fundamental component of business contracts, outlining the procedures for resolving conflicts or disagreements that may arise during the contractual relationship. This clause typically establishes the methods, such as negotiation, mediation, or arbitration, by which parties attempt to resolve disputes before resorting to litigation.

By providing a structured framework for promptly and efficiently addressing conflicts, the dispute resolution clause promotes fairness, preserves relationships, and minimises the costs and disruptions associated with formal legal proceedings. Additionally, it helps parties maintain control over the resolution process and tailor solutions to their specific needs and circumstances.

  1. Warranties and Disclaimers Clause

The warranties and disclaimers clause defines the parties’ rights, responsibilities, and expectations regarding the quality, performance, and fitness of the goods or services provided under the contract. This clause may include explicit assurances or guarantees made by one party regarding the characteristics or attributes of the products or services and any limitations or exclusions of liability for certain types of damages or losses.

By clarifying the scope of warranties and delineating the extent of liability, the clause helps manage risk, establish accountability, and protect parties from potential legal claims arising from breaches of contract or product defects. Additionally, it promotes transparency, fosters trust and facilitates informed decision-making by ensuring that parties are fully aware of their rights and obligations under the contract.

Conclusion

In conclusion, these crucial contract clauses are essential for drafting comprehensive and effective business agreements. From indemnification and limitations on liability to confidentiality and termination provisions, each serves to define rights, obligations, and protections for all parties involved. By carefully incorporating these clauses, businesses can mitigate risks, promote fairness, and ensure enforceability in their contractual relationships. Overall, a well-drafted contract with these essential clauses minimizes legal disputes, and fosters trust, transparency, and successful partnerships in the business world.

Author: Gayatri Singh, UPES Dehradun

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607