+91 74838 06607 info@origiin.com

Agreements which a Start-up Needs for Legal Protection

Starting a new business venture can be an exciting and challenging journey. As a budding start-up, it is crucial to lay a strong foundation by putting in place the necessary agreements to protect your interests legally. These agreements not only provide clarity between parties involved but also minimize potential risks, conflicts, and misunderstandings. In this article, we will explore some of the essential agreements that a start-up needs and discuss the key legal points associated with each.

Starting a new start-up can be an exciting and challenging endeavor. It requires determination, creativity, and a passion for your business idea. As you embark on this journey, it is crucial to recognize the importance of legal agreements in safeguarding your venture and ensuring its long-term success.

Legal agreements serve as the foundation of any business. They are a set of rules and guidelines that outline the rights, responsibilities, and obligations of the parties involved. Whether you are partnering with co-founders, seeking funding from investors, or collaborating with suppliers and vendors, having proper legal agreements in place is essential to protect your interests and mitigate potential risks.

  1. Co-Founder Agreement

When launching a start-up with multiple founders, it is essential to establish a co-founder agreement. This agreement clarifies roles, responsibilities, ownership percentages, and outlines the process for dispute resolution. Key legal points to consider in this agreement include vesting schedules, intellectual property rights, confidentiality clauses, and non-compete clauses. It is crucial to involve legal professionals to ensure all aspects of co-founder relationships are adequately addressed. This agreement solidifies the relationship between the founding members and outlines each party’s roles, responsibilities, and ownership stakes. It addresses key issues such as equity distribution, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for resolving disputes. A well-drafted co-founder agreement can prevent conflicts and ensure everyone is aligned on the company’s vision, values, and objectives.

  1. Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)

An NDA is necessary to protect your start-up’s confidential information when discussing business ideas, strategies, or any trade secrets with external parties. This agreement ensures that the recipient cannot disclose or misuse the confidential information shared. Legal points to consider when drafting an NDA include specifying the scope of information covered, the duration of the agreement, and the consequences of breaching the NDA. In the early stages, start-ups often rely on confidential information, trade secrets, and intellectual property to gain a competitive advantage. An NDA is a legally binding agreement that protects sensitive information by ensuring it remains confidential. It prevents partners, employees, and contractors from sharing or using proprietary information without proper authorization. An NDA helps establish trust, fosters innovation, and safeguards your startup’s most valuable assets.

  1. Employee/Independent Contractor Agreements

When hiring employees or engaging with independent contractors, it is crucial to have written agreements in place. These agreements protect your start-up’s interests and clearly define the employment relationship. Legal points to consider in these agreements include job responsibilities, compensation, intellectual property assignment, confidentiality provisions, termination clauses, and non-compete obligations.

Employee agreements are essential for businesses that hire workers on a regular basis to perform specific tasks within the organization. These agreements establish the terms and conditions of employment, including job responsibilities, working hours, compensation, benefits, and termination procedures. By clearly outlining these details, employers can avoid misunderstandings and potential disputes that may arise down the line.

One of the primary reasons why employee agreements are crucial is that they establish the employer-employee relationship, ensuring that all parties are aware of their roles and responsibilities. This clarity reduces the likelihood of confusion and helps maintain a harmonious working environment. Furthermore, employee agreements provide employers with the legal framework to address issues related to intellectual property, confidentiality, and non-compete clauses. By including these provisions in the agreement, employers can protect their proprietary information and prevent employees from engaging in activities that may harm the company’s interests.

Additionally, employee agreements contribute to the overall compliance of the business with labour laws and regulations. These agreements typically cover important legal requirements, such as minimum wage, working hours, overtime pay, and benefits, ensuring that the company adheres to these standards. Failing to comply with labor laws can result in costly penalties and legal repercussions, which could be detrimental to the stability and reputation of the organization.

  1. Terms of Service/End User License Agreement (EULA)

If your start-up provides software, applications, or any online services, having a Terms of Service or EULA is vital. This agreement outlines the terms and conditions which users must abide by when utilizing your product or service. Legal points to consider in this agreement include disclaimers, limitations of liability, intellectual property rights, data protection, and dispute resolution provisions.

TOS and EULAs explicitly outline the terms under which users can access and use the service. They cover a wide range of aspects, including user privacy, intellectual property rights, payment terms, and limitations of liability. By clearly defining these parameters, TOS and EULAs protect both parties from misunderstandings and help prevent legal issues.

Furthermore, these legal agreements help ensure the security and privacy of users’ personal information. With cyber threats and data breaches becoming increasingly common, it is crucial for service providers to establish robust privacy policies. TOS and EULAs disclose the types of personal information collected, the purposes for which it is used, and any third parties with whom it may be shared. This transparency enables users to make informed decisions about their privacy and helps build trust between the user and the service provider.

An often-overlooked aspect of TOS and EULAs is the protection they offer to the intellectual property rights of service providers. Whether it’s software code, copyrighted content, or trademarks, these legal agreements enforce the protection of these assets. By agreeing to the terms, users acknowledge that they do not have the right to copy, distribute, or modify the service provider’s intellectual property without explicit permission. This protection incentivizes innovations and creativity while discouraging unauthorized use and infringement.

  1. Vendor/Supplier Agreements

As a start-up, you may rely on various vendors or suppliers for materials, resources, or services. Having written agreements with these parties ensures clarity and legal protection. Key legal points to consider in vendor/supplier agreements include the specifications of goods or services, payment terms, delivery schedules, warranties, indemnification clauses, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

One of the key reasons why vendor agreements are important is that they provide a solid legal foundation for your business relationships. By outlining the terms and conditions that govern the provision of goods or services, these agreements protect the interests of both parties involved. They ensure that there is clarity on issues such as payment terms, delivery schedules, quality standards, and intellectual property rights.

A well-drafted vendor agreement also helps to prevent disputes and disagreements. By clearly defining the expectations and obligations of each party, potential areas of conflict can be identified and addressed upfront. This helps to mitigate the risk of disagreements arising in the future, saving both time and resources.

  1. Investor Agreements

Start-ups must also consider the importance of shareholder agreements. As your start-up grows and attracts investment, shareholders agreements become vital in protecting the rights of shareholders and dictating the governance of the company. These agreements establish rules for share transfers, dividend distribution, and the appointment of directors. They provide clarity and transparency, which helps maintain trust and harmony among shareholders. When seeking external funding for your start-up, investor agreements are crucial. These agreements outline the terms and conditions associated with the investment, including the ownership stake, voting rights, exit strategies, and other provisions to protect both the investor and the start-up. Legal points to consider in investor agreements include anti-dilution clauses, vesting schedules, and representations and warranties made by both parties.

  1. Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement

Start-ups heavily rely on innovative ideas, designs, trademarks, and other intellectual property. An intellectual property assignment agreement ensures that any intellectual property developed by employees or contractors is transferred to the start-up. Legal points to consider in this agreement include specifically identifying the intellectual property being assigned, warranty provisions, and indemnification against any infringement claims.

By having these essential agreements in place, start-ups can protect themselves legally, mitigate risks, and ensure a smooth operation. It is crucial to consult with legal professionals experienced in start-up law to ensure all the necessary legal points are addressed adequately. Remember, investing time and effort into these agreements today will save you from potential legal headaches in the future.

In conclusion, starting a start-up is an exhilarating journey that requires careful planning and attention to legal matters. By implementing the necessary agreements mentioned above, start-ups can establish a solid legal foundation, protecting their interests, and fostering growth and success. Agreements are the backbone of a start-up’s legal framework and play a crucial role in protecting the interests of the company and its stakeholders. Co-founder agreements, employment agreements, intellectual property agreements, technology-related agreements, supplier and vendor contracts, investment agreements, and customer agreements are all essential for a start-up’s success. By having these agreements in place, start-ups can mitigate legal risks, establish clear expectations, and pave the way for growth and success in their industry.

Author: Jyoti Jain

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

Contract Management

In today’s interconnected world, contracts govern business and personal interactions, making contract management vital. From simple agreements to complex corporate deals, contracts underpin transactions and relationships. With increasing contract frequency and complexity, effective management is crucial. It ensures compliance, mitigates risks and enhances operational efficiency. Proficient contract management is indispensable for navigating modern business complexities.

In this article, we delve into the realm of contract management, exploring its significance, key components, challenges, and best practices.

What is Contract Management?

Contract management is the systematic process of handling all aspects of a contract, from its creation to its execution and eventual closure. It involves various activities such as drafting contracts, negotiating terms, obtaining approvals, tracking obligations, managing changes, ensuring compliance, and evaluating performance. Essentially, it’s about effectively overseeing the entire lifecycle of contracts to maximize value, minimize risks, and maintain positive relationships with all parties involved.

Importance of Contract Management 

Contract management is crucial for ensuring clarity and compliance in business transactions. It minimizes legal risks by outlining rights and obligations clearly. Efficient contract management enhances operational efficiency, streamlining processes from initiation to closure. It fosters trust and accountability among parties, facilitating smoother business relationships. Effective contract management maximizes value and minimizes risks, enabling organizations to achieve their goals efficiently and securely.

Key Stages of Contract Management

  1. Contract Initiation: It begins by identifying the need for a contract, setting clear goals, and identifying the involved parties. This stage is crucial for outlining initial terms and conditions that will guide the contract’s development.
  1. Contract Creation and Negotiation: This stage involves drafting the contract document, reviewing it thoroughly, and engaging in negotiations to ensure alignment with all parties’ interests. Redlining and discussions help refine terms, aiming for a consensus that benefits all stakeholders.
  2. Contract Approval: After negotiations, the contract undergoes legal review to ensure compliance with laws and regulations. Stakeholder approval is then sought, and once obtained, the contract is formalized through authorized signatures, signaling readiness for execution.
  3. Contract Execution: With all approvals secured, the contract enters the execution phase, where parties fulfill agreed-upon terms, deliver goods or services, and meet contractual obligations. This stage marks the implementation of the contract’s terms and conditions.
  1. Contract Monitoring and Management: Beyond execution, ongoing monitoring is essential to ensure contract performance and compliance. This involves scrutinizing performance metrics, safeguarding compliance with terms, and promptly addressing any deviations or issues that arise.
  2. Contract Renewal or Termination: Contracts have finite durations, leading to the evaluation of renewal, modification, or termination options. This stage involves assessing performance, renegotiating terms if necessary, and deciding on the appropriate course of action for the contract’s future.

Benefits of Contract Management

  1. Efficiency: Contract management streamlines processes by leveraging software and automation, freeing up time for evaluating contract effectiveness and meeting expectations efficiently.
  2. Business Improvement: Successful contract management provides valuable insights into negotiation strategies and cost-saving measures, driving overall business improvement and competitiveness in the market.
  3. Risk Reduction: Clearly defined contractual terms mitigate legal and financial risks, empowering businesses to navigate uncertainties confidently and prudently.
  4. Vendor Tracking: Contract management facilitates better communication and understanding between companies and vendors, fostering stronger relationships and enabling informed decision-making based on vendor performance evaluations.
  5. Compliance Enforcement: Contracts serve as enforceable agreements, ensuring all parties fulfill their obligations, maintain transparency, and adhere to regulatory requirements, promoting trust and accountability in business dealings.

Challenges in Contract Management

  1. Complexity: Contracts can be intricate, involving multiple parties, legal requirements, and technical specifications, making them challenging to manage effectively.
  2. Compliance: Ensuring compliance with legal and regulatory standards across different jurisdictions adds complexity to contract management, requiring careful monitoring and documentation.
  3. Communication: Effective communication among stakeholders, including legal teams, procurement, and vendors, is crucial for successful contract management but can be hindered by siloed information and inefficient processes.
  4. Contract Renewals: Tracking contract expiration dates and negotiating renewals in a timely manner can be challenging, leading to potential disruptions in business operations or missed opportunities for cost savings.
  5. Technology Adoption: Leveraging contract management software and automation tools can enhance efficiency, but implementing and integrating these technologies into existing workflows may present technical and organizational challenges.

Best Practices in Contract Management

  1. Centralize and standardize agreements: Streamline contract creation by using standardized templates and pre-approved language. Centralize contracts in a searchable repository for easy access and secure storage, enhancing efficiency and legal compliance.
  2. Set sensible key performance indicators (KPIs): Define KPIs aligned with organizational goals, such as contract creation and approval times. Utilize contract management solutions to track performance metrics and identify areas for improvement.
  3. Track obligations: Ensure fulfillment of contractual obligations by implementing systems to track and monitor obligations throughout the contract lifecycle. Utilize contract management software to send timely reminders and prevent oversight of critical obligations.
  4. Automate communications: Replace email-based communication with centralized contract management software to ensure real-time notifications and streamline stakeholder communication. Automate communication processes to enhance efficiency and reduce errors.
  1. Utilize clickwrap and electronic signatures: Expedite contract signing processes by offering clickwrap and electronic signature options. Incorporate these options into contract management solutions to provide a seamless signing experience and reduce friction in high-volume contract transactions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, effective contract management is essential for navigating the intricacies of modern business relationships. By implementing best practices, addressing challenges, and leveraging technology, organizations can streamline processes, minimize risks, and maximize value throughout the contract lifecycle. From initiation to renewal or termination, meticulous attention to detail and strategic planning are crucial for ensuring successful outcomes. Mastering contract management drives efficiency and fosters positive relationships with stakeholders, enabling businesses to thrive in today’s dynamic landscape.

Author: Gayatri Singh, UPES Dehradun

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

Competency of Parties to a contract under Indian Contract Act, 1872

For an agreement to be valid, the first requirement is that an agreement must be made by parties who are competent to contract. This is laid down in sections 11 and 12 of the Act[1]. Section 11 states that the person who is competent to enter the contract. It provides that every person is competent to contract who is

 (i) Age of majority;

(ii) Sound mind and

(iii) Not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject.

  1. Agreement by minors

 Minor is a person who has not attained the age of majority. In other words, a minor is a person who has not completed 18 years of his or her age except –

 (i) When the guardian of a minor’s property or person is appointed by court.

(ii) When the minor’s property is taken over by the court of the ward for management. In both cases, the age of the majority is 21 years. Following are the laws relating to an agreement by a minor: An agreement by a minor is void.

 A minor cannot bind himself by a contract, but he can make the other party contract to be bound to him under this contract. A minor can become a promisee or a payee or endorsee of the property. A minor’s contract cannot be ratified.  A minor is not personally liable for the supply of necessaries, but the minor’s property is liable for necessaries.

  • Liability of minor is tort i.e. civil wrong.
  • There can be no estoppel against a minor.
  • A minor can be admitted to benefits of partnership and appointed as an agent.
  • A minor can hold property.
  1. Agreement by persons of unsound mind

Section 12 of the Act states what sound mind is for the purposes of the contracting.

 A person is said to be of sound mind to make a contract if, when he makes it, he can understand it and form a rational judgment as to its effect on his interest. When a person is of unsound mind but occasionally of sound mind can make a contract when he is of sound mind and vice versa. The unsoundness of mind may be due to idiocy, lunacy, insanity, drunkenness, contract by lunatic, contract by drunkard etc.

Impact of Incompetency

The foundation of a contract’s legality in India is established by the Indian Contract Act (ICA), 1872. The parties’ competency is one of the essential components of a legitimate contract. According to Section 11 of the Act, incompetence is the lack of one or more characteristics that a person needs in order to be able to make a legally enforceable agreement. For people and companies involved in contractual transactions, it is essential to comprehend how incompetency affects contracts under the ICA.

Key Categories of Incompetent Parties:

  1. Minors: Individuals below the age of 18 (with exceptions) are considered minors. Generally, contracts entered into by minors are void, meaning they have no legal effect (Section 11). However, exceptions exist for:

Necessaries: Contracts for essential goods and services like food, clothing, and shelter are enforceable (Section 68).

Personal benefit contracts: Agreements like marriage or apprenticeship that directly benefit the minor can be valid.

Ratification: Minors can ratify contracts upon attaining majority, making them binding.

  1. Persons of unsound mind: Individuals lacking the mental capacity to comprehend the contract’s nature and consequences are deemed incompetent. Contracts made during such periods are void (Section 12). However, exceptions include:

Lucid intervals: Agreements made during periods of sound mental state are valid.

Necessaries: Similar to minors, contracts for necessaries can be enforceable.

Ratification: Similar to minors, ratification upon regaining sound mind can validate the contract.

Impact of incompetency of contract

Void contracts: Contracts entered into by incompetent parties are generally void (except for mentioned exceptions). This means:

No legal obligations: Neither party is bound to fulfill the contract’s terms.

No enforcement: Courts cannot enforce void contracts.

Restitution: In some cases, courts may order restitution of property or benefits unjustly obtained due to incompetency.

In case of Mohiri Bibi v. Dharmodas Ghosh (1906)[2], A minor entered into a mortgage agreement for her deceased husband’s debt. The Privy Council held the contract void, emphasizing that contracts by minors are generally unenforceable, even for debts, unless they fall under the necessaries exception.

In another case of Amar Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1957)[3], A contract for necessaries with a person of unsound mind was held enforceable, reiterating the exception for essential goods and services.

Conclusion

Understanding the impact of incompetency on contracts under the ICA is crucial for safeguarding legal interests. Parties entering agreements should exercise due diligence to ascertain the other party’s competency. If faced with situations involving incompetency, seeking legal advice promptly is highly recommended to navigate the complexities and protect your rights.

Landmark cases like Mohiri Bibi and the Amar Singh case illustrate the practical application of the ICA and highlight the exceptions and nuances associated with each category.

Author: Chandan Jhinkwan, Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT Karagpur

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

Important Clauses of a Business Contract

Business contracts serve as legally binding agreements outlining terms for transactions like partnerships, leases, and licensing deals. Within these contracts, clauses specify each party’s rights, obligations, and remedies, clarifying terms and managing risks. While contract clauses vary, certain essential ones, such as dispute resolution, indemnification, warranties, termination, limitations of liability, and confidentiality, are universally vital. These clauses define obligations, safeguard interests, and ensure contract enforceability.

In this article, we explore the significance and nuances of these important clauses within business contracts.

Important Contract Clauses

  1. Indemnification Clause

The indemnification clause is a cornerstone of business contracts, allocating risks and protecting parties from potential legal liabilities. It outlines the procedures for compensating one party (the indemnified party) for specific expenses or losses incurred due to actions or omissions of the other party (the indemnifying party).

By clearly delineating responsibilities and liabilities, this clause helps maintain clarity and accountability in contractual relationships. It enables parties to negotiate and agree upon acceptable levels of risk, providing a framework for resolving disputes and minimizing the potential for costly litigation.

  1. Force Majeure Clause 

Incorporating a force majeure clause is essential for addressing unforeseeable events or circumstances that may hinder the performance of contractual obligations. This clause typically excuses parties from fulfilling their contractual duties in the event of “acts of God” such as natural disasters, wars, or government actions beyond their control.

By specifying the conditions under which performance may be suspended or excused, the force majeure clause helps mitigate the risks associated with unpredictable events, ensuring fairness and equity in contractual arrangements.

  1. Limitations on Liability Clause

The limitations on the liability clause play a crucial role in defining the extent of financial responsibility each party assumes under the contract. It sets forth the maximum amount of damages or losses for which a party can be held liable in the event of breaches, negligence, or other contractual violations.

By capping potential liabilities and specifying the types of damages recoverable, this clause provides certainty and predictability, reducing the risk of excessive financial exposure and facilitating smoother dispute resolution processes.

  1. Confidentiality Clause

Including a confidentiality clause is essential for safeguarding sensitive information and proprietary data exchanged between parties during the course of the contract. This clause imposes obligations on both parties to maintain the confidentiality of confidential information and restrict its use or disclosure to authorised individuals.

By establishing clear guidelines for handling confidential information, the confidentiality clause helps protect trade secrets, intellectual property, and other valuable assets, fostering trust and preserving competitive advantage.

  1. Copyright Clause

The copyright clause protects the contracting parties’ intellectual property rights, particularly in transactions involving creating or using copyrighted materials. It explicitly states the ownership rights, usage permissions, and restrictions related to copyrighted works exchanged or developed under the contract.

By acknowledging and respecting the copyright ownership of creative works, this clause helps prevent unauthorized use or infringement, ensuring compliance with intellectual property laws and preserving the integrity of original creations.

  1. Termination Clause

The termination clause outlines the conditions and procedures for terminating the contract before its natural expiration. It may specify various grounds for termination, such as breach of contract, insolvency, or mutual agreement between the parties. Additionally, the clause often includes provisions regarding notice periods, termination fees, and post-termination obligations.

By providing a clear mechanism for ending the contract, the termination clause enhances certainty, reduces ambiguity, and protects the interests of both parties in the event of unforeseen circumstances or dissatisfaction with the contractual relationship.

  1. Dispute Resolution Clause

The dispute resolution clause is a fundamental component of business contracts, outlining the procedures for resolving conflicts or disagreements that may arise during the contractual relationship. This clause typically establishes the methods, such as negotiation, mediation, or arbitration, by which parties attempt to resolve disputes before resorting to litigation.

By providing a structured framework for promptly and efficiently addressing conflicts, the dispute resolution clause promotes fairness, preserves relationships, and minimises the costs and disruptions associated with formal legal proceedings. Additionally, it helps parties maintain control over the resolution process and tailor solutions to their specific needs and circumstances.

  1. Warranties and Disclaimers Clause

The warranties and disclaimers clause defines the parties’ rights, responsibilities, and expectations regarding the quality, performance, and fitness of the goods or services provided under the contract. This clause may include explicit assurances or guarantees made by one party regarding the characteristics or attributes of the products or services and any limitations or exclusions of liability for certain types of damages or losses.

By clarifying the scope of warranties and delineating the extent of liability, the clause helps manage risk, establish accountability, and protect parties from potential legal claims arising from breaches of contract or product defects. Additionally, it promotes transparency, fosters trust and facilitates informed decision-making by ensuring that parties are fully aware of their rights and obligations under the contract.

Conclusion

In conclusion, these crucial contract clauses are essential for drafting comprehensive and effective business agreements. From indemnification and limitations on liability to confidentiality and termination provisions, each serves to define rights, obligations, and protections for all parties involved. By carefully incorporating these clauses, businesses can mitigate risks, promote fairness, and ensure enforceability in their contractual relationships. Overall, a well-drafted contract with these essential clauses minimizes legal disputes, and fosters trust, transparency, and successful partnerships in the business world.

Author: Gayatri Singh, UPES Dehradun

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607

Video games and IPR

Video games are amongst the most widely enjoyed forms of entertainment today. While video games are predominantly played by people in their adolescence, these games are making their way into a multimillion-dollar full-fledged industry that is based on competitive playing. With this level of involvement of games in the lives of people everywhere, it then comes as no surprise that there have been cases where popular characters of video games have come under the spotlight of intellectual property theft. Let’s take a look at a case riddled with twists featuring some of the world’s most popular movie and video game characters.

The case

When we picture the word “Mario”, we instantly imagine a character wearing a red plumber’s uniform, bouncing on platforms to save his princess from evil forces. And when we hear the phrase “King Kong”, our minds instantly jump to a massive gorilla waving his arms around, swatting at airplanes atop the empire state building. It may come as a surprise that the owning studios of these productions have in fact gone head-to-head in a rather interesting lawsuit regarding the theft of the idea of the popular oversized gorilla.

The movie King Kong was first released in the year 1933 by Merian C. Cooper. The production house for King Kong was RKO, which later went on to release subsequent sequels of King Kong in the following years. The movie franchise went on to do very well, earning their producers and directors large sums of money throughout the runtime of the movie. In the year 1981, Nintendo released their game Donkey Kong, where Donkey Kong was a large ape and would attempt to stop Mario (then called Jumpman) from reaching Pauline (Mario’s romantic interest, then called Lady). The game was a big hit and it was simply a matter of time before the game caught the eye of Universal Studios, who then apparently held the license for King Kong. Outraged at Nintendo and other game studios for blatantly copying the idea of King Kong, Universal Studios sternly ordered every agency selling products under the name of Donkey Kong to pay Universal Studios royalties for the misuse of Donkey Kong by way of cease-and-desist letters. Almost all the agencies reverted back with the royalty payments, except Nintendo.

Nintendo attempted to settle the suit outside the proceedings of a court in the year 1982 to which the Vice President of Universal Studios Robert Hadl responded by asking Nintendo to stop making copies of Donkey Kong. Nintendo’s attorney Howard Lincoln pointed out that the name King Kong had previously been used on multiple products that were in no way affiliated with Universal Studios, claiming that Universal Studios in fact did not have the rights to King Kong in the first place. Hadl then asked Nintendo to brace themselves for a lawsuit, claiming that Universal Studios saw lawsuits as a way of making money.

John Kirby was brought in by Lincoln to represent Nintendo in the case because he had a history of winning big-name lawsuits for companies like Sony. During the proceedings, Universal Studios claimed that Nintendo’s Donkey Kong and Universal Studios’ King Kong could easily be confused with each other and that the story line of the movie and game were also similar. To counterattack, Nintendo asked a representative to assure the court that the gameplay of Donkey Kong was in no way similar to the storyline of King Kong. Additionally, Nintendo went on to claim that Universal Studios did not own the rights for King Kong and shockingly enough, that Universal Studios were aware of this fact and still decided to demand royalties for King Kong despite knowing they did not have the rights for King Kong.

Historically, the rights of King Kong had always been a territory undefined. When King Kong was initially released by Cooper in 1933, the rights were firmly with Cooper. Later on, Cooper realized that other production houses were making movies with the character King Kong, and that he had no clear documents preventing them from doing so. Cooper tried to find papers to authenticate his rights but found that he had given the rights for only 2 movies to a production house called RKO Pictures and for a book written by his friend Delos W. Lovelace sometime in the decade of 1970, a whole decade before the release of donkey Kong by Nintendo. However, Cooper could not find documents stating that the license was given to RKO Pictures. During this time, Universal Studios wanted to make their own series of movies on King Kong but were stopped as the rights to King Kong were with RKO Pictures. Desperate to win King Kong, Universal Studios argued in court that the copyright on Lovelace’s novel (which was the only existing document proving ownership of any kind) had expired by then and that King Kong was therefore a public domain character. The court decided that King Kong was indeed in the public domain and therefore anyone could make their reproductions of the character as long as the story involving the character was not copied.

The presiding judge during the 1982 case of Nintendo versus Universal Studios kept all this in mind and reprimanded Universal Studios for knowing fully well that Universal Studios had themselves contested that King Kong was a public domain character but still asserted that they owned the character and even demanded royalties from agencies making use of King Kong. The presiding judge further ruled that the game Donkey Kong was not similar to the storyline of King Kong in any way and was “a parody” at best, thus solidifying Nintendo’s case against Universal Studios. The judge declared that any agency that had paid royalties to Universal Studios were free to demand the royalty fee back from Universal Studios and that all cease-and-desist letters from Universal Studios were rendered null and void. Further, the court found that a game released by a company called Tiger Electronics was very similar to Donkey Kong and thus ordered Tiger Electronics to pay Nintendo a sum of $58 million.

Universal Studios was the one to push this lawsuit against Nintendo in order to extract money from them by means of a character that they didn’t have the rights for. Universal Studios knew this in fact because a few years ago they themselves had gone to court to prove that King Kong was a public domain character, and anyone was free to use the character. Nintendo had initially planned to settle the matter outside of the court but went against the movie giant Universal Studios and even won with getting money from profits from a by-product of the ruling. This case shows us that it is never a good idea to underestimate the court or your opponents, and to assume that all secrets regarding ownerships and rights are out in the open for everyone to access. Universal Studios underestimated the court and Nintendo and subsequently ended up losing the case.

Author: Udit Sharma, Graduate student in Additive Manufacturing, Uppsala University, Sweden

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel HERE

Contact us at to avail services in Patent, Trademark, Contracts, Patent Licensing, M&A

Email: info@origiin.com

Whatsapp: +91 7483806607

Joint ownership of a Patent: Benefits and risks

Indian patent law allows more than one person to come together and apply jointly for a patent. Upon grant of such patent, these applicants become joint/co-owners of the granted patent. Co-ownership of a patent might be unavoidable in certain scenarios when more than two parties have jointly invested or have common interests with respect to commercialisation of the patented product. Applicants who have joint ownership of a patent should be aware of the risks & legal ramifications involved because joint ownerships involve a great deal of shared investment and experience, both of which may be wasted if the applicants are not aware of risks and legal implications.

Co-ownership of a patent is dealt under sections 50 and 51 of the Indian Patents Act, 1970. Section 50 [Rights of co-owners of patents] lists out the rights of the joint owners as below:

  1. Each co-owner is entitled to an equal and undivided share in the patent, unless there is an agreement to the contrary. Co-owners may be two or more and they shall own equal share in the patent, by default. However, this equal share in the patent may be changed by executing an agreement where there is a clear mention of share each co-owner holds.
  2. Each co-owner is entitled to equal patent rights, as mentioned Section-48 [right of patentee], for his own benefit without accounting to the other person or persons. Each co-owner can independently commercialise the patent without seeking permission of other co-owner (s).
  3. If a patented article is sold by one of the co-owners, the purchaser and any person claiming through him shall be entitled to deal with the article in the same manner as if the article had been sold by a sole patentee.

As stated above, when a patent is jointly owned, all joint owners can commercialise the patent independently without consulting the other co-owners; however, a license for such patent shall not be granted to any third party by any of the co-owners without consent of the other co-owners. Further, a share in the patent shall not be assigned by one of the owners without consent of the other co-owners or joint owners. If proper care is not taken with respect to this clause while entering into a joint ownership of a patent, this may lead to dispute amongst the co-owners. Further, when a patented technology is sold by any one of the co-owners of the patent, the right that the buyer of the property acquires in the technology will be the same rights he would have acquired if the patent were not jointly held.

A patent shall be treated as a movable property (property that can be moved from one place to another) and rules of law applicable to the ownership and devolution of movable property generally shall apply in relation to patents. Movable property includes personal items such as clothing, jewellery, household goods such as furniture, decorative items and appliances and so on. For better understanding, let us take the following example.

Let us consider a situation where a patent has two joint owners: A and B.  According to Indian Patents Act, 1970 both of them have an equal and undivided share in the patent and both of them can exercise the rights granted to them under section 48 of the Act on their own without accounting or waiting for the other’s consent. Here, the patent should be handled like a movable property for the purposes of ownership and devolution of patent rights.

Though co-owners can enjoy equal patent rights and privileges, the problem starts when one of them wishes to assign or license the patent. If a patent has to be licensed in India, it has to be written, duly executed and registered. If A wants to license the patent to someone, A must obtain B’s permission. If B is not willing to consent to such licensing, the situation becomes complicated. In such circumstances A is left with only one option. A has to approach the Controller, seeking his power to direct B to agree to the licensing under Section 51 (1) of the Indian Patents Act 1970. This section empowers the Controller to give directions to joint owners regarding the sale or lease of the patent, grant of licenses etc. Powers of the Controller to give directions to co-owner in case of sale or lease or execution of instrument are as follows:

  • If a patent is co-owned, the Controller may give directions for the sale or lease of the patent or any interest therein or the exercise of any right under Section-50 to any of the co-owners. Such direction is given by the Controller only when application is made to him in the prescribed manner by any of the co-owners.
  • If any person registered as grantee or proprietor of a patent fails to execute any instrument or to do any other thing required for carrying out of any direction given under this section within 14 days after being requested in writing so to do by any of the other persons so registered, the Controller may, upon application made to him in the prescribed manner by any such other person, give directions empowering any person to execute that instrument or to do that thing in the name and on behalf of the person in default.

Illustration

Maya is registered as grantee of a patent and she fails to execute the instrument (license agreement) with 14 days after being requested by the co-owner of the patent. If the co-owner makes an application to the Controller, any other person can execute the instrument in the name and on behalf of Maya.

  • Before giving any directions under this section, the Controller shall give an opportunity for the following to be heard:
  1. In the case of an application under sub-section (1) to the other person or persons registered as grantee or proprietor of the patent;
    1. In the case of an application under sub-section (2), to the person in default.
  • No direction shall be given under this section so as to affect the mutual rights or obligations of trustees or of the legal representatives of a deceased person or of their rights or obligations as such, or which is inconsistent with the terms of any agreement between persons registered as grantee or proprietor of the patent.

Approaching the Controller for directions might turn out to be a time-consuming process. Also, it may lead to uncertainty as it will be the Controller who then will decide about the directions to be given. No directions will be given under this section so as to affect the mutual rights or obligations of trustees or of the legal representatives of a deceased person or of their rights or obligations as such, or which is inconsistent with the terms of any agreement between persons registered as grantee or proprietor of the patent. This situation may get further complicated if the ownership of the patent itself is in question. These possibilities make it imperative for the parties to take utmost care while entering into a joint ownership of a patent.

This whole complexity can be taken care of if both A and B enter into an agreement about how they would exercise the licensing rights each of them have in order to avoid such complexities later. So, a lot of hardships may be prevented if a little precaution is taken at the time of entering a joint ownership of a patent, specifically at the time of entering into an agreement about the licensing of the patent.

Watch video HERE

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel HERE

Contact us at to avail services in Patent, Trademark, Contracts, Patent Licensing, M&A

Email: info@origiin.com

Whatsapp: +91 7483806607

NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement)

A Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) or Confidentiality Agreement is a legally binding contract that establishes a legal relationship between the two parties where one party discloses the confidential information, and second party receives it. However, NDA may also be two sided where both the parties disclose and receive confidential information to each other. The parties signing the NDA agree that confidential information which they got access to, will not be made available to any others in unauthorised manner because such unauthorised disclosure may put disclosing party at a big risk.

What is Confidential Information?

Confidential information is defined as information which is not in public domain, has economic value and the owner of such information has taken reasonable steps to safeguard it. Confidential information may be categorised into technical and business information. Technical information generally includes inventions, ideas, drawings, designs, software code etc whereas business information may be related to acquisition or merging, employee salaries, future plans, product launch, press release, financial data of the company. Any information which is in public domain cannot be named as confidential information. It is important to take utmost precautions to protect confidential information of the company. Other than physical measures, companies shall also have right policies & processes to safeguard it. Executing NDA is one of the ways to safeguard such valuable information wherein the parties disclosing and receiving the confidential information agree on specific terms and conditions to avoid misappropriation of the information.

When is NDA needed?

Businesses need to disclose business or technical information to third parties very often and it is important to take precautions before such sensitive information is disclosed. NDA is an important agreement to be executed in the instance when such information is disclosed and requires to be safeguarded:

  1. Business or product information is to be revealed to external vendors/consultants to seek advise or to get the product manufactured.
  2. Business/financial/product information is to be discussed with investors.
  3. Intellectual Property, especially invention details are to be disclosed to the patent attorney.
  4. Company information is to be shared with the employees.

Main clauses of NDA

Like any other agreement, NDA is signed between atleast two parties wherein one party discloses, and other party receives the confidential information. In some situations, both parties may disclose, or receive information from each other and such NDA may be called as mutual NDA.

The agreement starts with date of execution and full name & address of the parties. All the important terms used in the agreement, including the term “Confidential Information” shall be defined to avoid discrepancies at later point of time. Reason and purpose to execute the agreement shall be defined in the agreement along with obligation of both the parties.

Every agreement, including NDA, that is executed shall be have a specific term. Date of execution, term of the agreement and way of termination form a very important part of the agreement. Depending upon need and life of confidential information, term of NDA may be fixed. For example, if the purpose of NDA is to maintain confidentiality of the invention before filing for a patent, then, as soon as patent is filed for, the confidentiality of the invention may not be strictly required to be maintained.

Injunctive Relief forms part of most NDAs where disclosing party has the right to injunctive relief to stop the other party from breaching the agreement. Under this clause, the disclosing party can get a court order to stop the other party from breaching the agreement. 

Apart from this, governing law, jurisdiction shall be specified to ensure that if any dispute happens, it is resolved with least difficulty.

Conclusion

NDA is one of the most commonly executed agreement and is used for various purposes. In order to be enforceable, the NDA shall have all the clauses of a valid agreement.

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel HERE

Contact us at to avail services in Patent, Trademark, Contracts, Patent Licensing, M&A

Email: info@origiin.com

Whatsapp: +91 7483806607

Contract Law: A Comprehensive Study on Reciprocal Promises

Section 2(f) of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 says that “Promises which form the consideration or part of the consideration for each other, are called Reciprocal Promises”.[1] In essence, this implies that promises exchanged in a contract are referred to as reciprocal promises. When multiple promises must be fulfilled concurrently, the promisor is not required to fulfil them unless the promisee is prepared and willing to fulfil his end of the bargain.[2] This principle has been established under Section 51.

For example, If Party A and Party B sign a contract wherein A will deliver particular goods to B and the payment shall be made in cash upon delivery, then there is no obligation on A to deliver the aforementioned goods unless they see a willingness on the side of B to make the payment in cash.

In the majority of business contracts, two or more parties normally agree to fulfil certain responsibilities toward one another. Such responsibilities may take the form of reciprocal promises, which are assurances that provide some or all of the consideration for one another. In other words, the performance of the responsibility of a party is conditional upon the other party completing their own. The notable clauses with respect to reciprocal promises are Sections 51 to 54 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872. While Sections 51 and 52 describe the various circumstances in which a reciprocal promise may be applicable, Sections 53 and 54 deal with instances in which one party breaches its responsibility.

Background

Contracts are the foundations for many agreements. Contracts often include one party promising to do something in exchange for the other party performing another act. However, parties to contracts sometimes only agree to take particular actions or make promises to take certain actions. Promises are not tangible, in contrast to an act. As a result, several questions may arise because of its nature. One is considered to make a proposal when he or she indicates their will to do (or not do) something. A proposal becomes a promise when it is accepted by the other party (to whom it is offered). In this case, the one who makes the proposal is the “promisor” and the individual to whom this proposal is made to is the “promisee”. The act of the promise is known as “consideration of the promise” when the promisee acts in accordance with the promisor’s wishes and either fulfils the promise or refuses to fulfil it. An agreement is created by these promises. Reciprocal promises are the kind of promises that make up an agreement.

Consideration and Promise

Under Section 2(d) of the Act, it states that consideration occurs when the promisor makes a promise to do or not do anything; this action is referred to as consideration of the promise. Reciprocal Promises is the term used when such promises constitute an agreement. Reciprocal promises are a portion of the consideration or make up the consideration for the contract, as stated in section 2(f) of The Indian Contract Act. A promise for a promise that creates an agreement is called a reciprocal promise.

A question may arise as to whether every consideration can be considered as a reciprocal promise. Consideration is typically referred to as a reciprocal promise since it is a promise made by the promisee to the promisor as part of an agreement. Similar to reciprocal promises, consideration is a promise for a promise and a reciprocal promise is a promise for a promise, however specifics will depend on the circumstances and nature of the transaction.  Consideration may include cost or some value in exchange for the promise as a consideration. Each transaction may include a different amount of consideration. As an illustration, consider money or a commitment as consideration to do or not do anything.

To answer another question as to whether every reciprocal promise is a consideration, reciprocal promises are not regarded as consideration. Reciprocal promises are a list of commitments made by both parties to a contract. Reciprocal promises create agreements. However, depending on the transactions occurring, there could be exceptions to the statement.

Types of Reciprocal Promises

  1. Mutual and Independent

Although not protected by the Act, this idea has developed via jurisprudence. It requires the contracting parties to carry out certain duties independently of one another, and their execution is not reliant on the other party carrying out its obligations under the agreement. However, the contract requires the fulfilment of these separate and overlapping obligations.

For example, let’s say that “A,” a government organization, and “B,” a private contractor, enter into a contract for “B” to construct a bridge. If such a contract requires “A” to disclose information on, for instance, power projects to “B,” but such information has no bearing on building the bridge, then “B” will not be released from fulfilling its commitment to build the bridge simply because “A” did not provide the pertinent information. Although they are mutual and independent, the two pledges made by the parties to one another are binding. In fact, even if “B” falters on the bridge construction, “A” will still be required to divulge information about the power projects. However, even if the aforementioned two commitments are mutual and independent, the contract’s conditions would be maintained if it specified that they must be fulfilled in a specific sequence.

 In the landmark case of Mrs. Saradamani Kandappan vs. Mrs. S. Rajalakshmi and Ors[3], The Supreme Court affirmed the provisions of the agreement and acknowledged the mutual and independent nature of the reciprocal promises. Rajalakshmi and Saradamani had struck a deal for the purchase of a plot of property, which required a number of monthly payments. Prior to making the final payment, Saradamani requested that Rajalakshmi present the title paperwork. Saradamani failed to make the last payment as a result of Rajalakshmi’s refusal. Rajalakshmi cancelled the contract as a result of the last instalment not being paid on time. Following litigation in many venues, the Supreme Court ruled that the two promises—paying the last instalment and displaying the title documents—were mutually incompatible. Saradamani had brought a lawsuit for a particular performance. It also ruled that Saradamani’s reluctance to pay was improper since the contract did not stipulate that the buyer must first examine the title papers before making payment. However, the Supreme Court determined that the contract was dissolved because of the passing of time and ordered Rajalakshmi to refund the money she got from Saradamani.

  1. Concurrent

This is a typical instance of a reciprocal commitment when the parties are required to carry out their duties overtly or implicitly concurrently. If the other party is not “ready” and “willing” to carry out its responsibility, the party willing to execute its promise will be excused from doing so.

For example, in the previously provided example, if “A” was required to engage vendors through a tender process to source some raw materials for “B,” including those sourced by “B,” then “B” might discharge itself from completing its commitment if “A” was not “ready” and “willing” to issue bids on time. In this example, simultaneous fulfilment of “A’s” and “B’s” reciprocal promises is essential to the contract’s successful completion. The Supreme Court ruled in J.P. Builders v. A. Ramadas Rao[4] that “readiness” relates to financial capability and “willingness” refers to the behaviour of the person that is seeking performance, and that typically the former is supported by the latter.

  1. Conditional

This is the most typical kind of reciprocal promise, and it nearly always becomes a point of contention anytime there is a disagreement over a government contract that has been broken. According to this, the performance of one party is dependent upon the other party fulfilling a duty. The first party would not be able to keep its promise if the second party did not carry out its duties in line with the contract. Whether or not a promise is deemed conditional depends on the specifics of each situation.

For example, resuming the earlier example, if the contract between “A” and “B” also provided that “A” would construct a road leading to the proposed bridge in order to allow “B” to transport large machinery and equipment to the site, then “A’s” breach of this obligation would have an effect on “B’s” ability to fulfil its portion of the agreement. The transaction would still be seen as a reciprocal commitment owing to its fundamental nature and purpose, i.e., without the road, construction on the bridge cannot begin. Even if the contract did not clearly state that building the road is a precondition to beginning work on the bridge.

In M/s Shanti Builders vs. CIBA Industrial Workers’ Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd.[5] , a disagreement erupted over certain construction work that Shanti Builders was required to do. According to CIBA, Shanti Builders failed to finish the building work in line with the contract, which caused significant losses for them. On the other side, Shanti Builders claimed that it had not received a plot of land as the contractually required payment for the building work that had already been finished and that it would be unable to proceed with the next stage of the project unless such payment was made. The court backed Shanti Builders’ arguments after hearing from the parties and adopted the stance that if the fulfilment of a contract calls for a specific sequence (even if it is not expressly specified), then such sequence must always be followed. It also ruled that in cases where reciprocal pledges are reliant on one another, one party cannot demand the fulfilment of a promise if the other has not fulfilled its own.

Consequences to default

When a contract contains reciprocal promises, which means that one of them cannot be performed or that its performance cannot be claimed until the other has been fulfilled, and the promisor of the last-mentioned promise breaks that promise, that promisor cannot claim the fulfilment of the reciprocal promise and must instead compensate the other party to the contract for any losses that such other party may incur as a result of the contract’s non-performance.

For Example, A hires B’s ship to transport cargo from Bombay to Mauritius that B will furnish, with B getting a certain freight in exchange for transporting the cargo. A does not supply the ship with any cargo. A cannot demand that B fulfil his commitment, and must instead seek recompense from B for the harm that B suffers as a result of the contract’s non-performance.

Conclusion

Commercial contracts sometimes include reciprocal promises, particularly those that include the government, such as those for energy, infrastructure, etc. Courts frequently wrestle with contracts that contain reciprocal promises and have invalidated arbitral decisions made under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act due to an incorrect interpretation of reciprocity, underscoring the fundamental significance of this concept. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehend the subtleties of the interpretation, ramifications, and degree of responsibility placed on each side by such reciprocal promises.

Author: Ankitha Amby, Faculty of Law, PES University

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

The Essential Aspects of Software Development Contract

A Software Development Contract is a contract between a corporation and a software developer in which the firm expresses its concepts and requirements. The developer then proceeds to design the software according to the company’s schedule constraints.

Such agreements are common in software organizations where developers are contracted to create computer software for both commercial and private use. As a result, it’s critical to determine the parameters of both developers’ and companies’ rights in relation to software.

A software development agreement is a contract in which one party (the Developer) undertakes to develop software for another party (the Client or the Company). While design and development procedures differ based on the complexity of the project and the team employed, there are a few important issues that are universally applicable and should be taken into account while negotiating the contract.

A written development agreement can be thought of as a road map. It will prevent disagreements if it is effectively drafted. It will provide solutions to problems if they arise. If the parties get into a disagreement, it will determine their legal obligations to each other. To create a software development contract, what is necessary is an understanding of the potential complexities.  This article outlines the most crucial aspects of a software development agreement. 

What are the Ingredients of a Software Development Contract? The following information is commonly engraved in a software development contract:

 Duties of the developer

All of the developer’s responsibilities must be outlined in the contract, including:

  1. Software development in accordance with the company’s Software Requirements Specifications and in accordance with the company’s milestones at various stages.
  2. Answering concerns regarding the program for a specified period of time following delivery.
  3. The developer must also acknowledge the company’s right to terminate the contract if the developer violates the terms and conditions of the contract.
  4. The limit of support to be offered by the company and the time period for completion of the project.

Services to be offered

The contract should define the development services expected from the partner. This section of the contract usually relates to the contract’s specification, which is an inherent aspect of it. The project scope that is to be delivered should be clearly stated in the specification. Try to issue the specifications in as much detail as possible to safeguard both the parties from conflicts.

The mechanism for changing the scope should also be described in the Services section. Any changes recommended by any party should be made in writing, in accordance to good practice. The  addition of a statement indicating that any change request must include the following information:

  • Description of the change
  • The impact of the modification on the project’s cost and timeline.

Acceptance

The acceptance period after delivery may be specified, during which the company can assess and test the software to ensure that it is completely compliant with the specifications. When the developer provides a product that meets all of the specifications, the delivery is considered complete. A Rejection clause could be introduced, allowing the corporation to reject the product if the software does not meet their specifications or if the developer is unable to deliver the complete product. The refusal must be written down.

Acceptance testing 

Specify whether acceptance testing will be performed on the developer’s end or by the vendor. Acceptance testing is typically performed at the conclusion of each development phase, so this section may also refer to the detailed project plan.

The contract should state in the context of acceptance testing:

  • Who conducts the tests?
  • The length of time it takes to complete the tests
  • The manner in which test findings are communicated (the best way is to notify the other side in writing about the acceptance) 

Specifics on delivery

The contract must state the date by which the software must be completely functional and correspond to the standards, as well as:

  1. The developer’s corrections in the event of non-conformity in certain areas of the finished product. And,
  2. The manner by which the company will notify the developer if any non-conformity is discovered.

Training

The developer’s obligations for training the corporate personnel in the usage of the software, as well as the approximate hours of training and the location of training, must be specified. Any additional expenditure associated with training must also be disclosed.

Maintenance and Support

The duration of the developer’s support and maintenance for the software program, as well as the terms of renewal, must be specified.

Maintenance

As new technology arrives, software evolves at a breakneck pace. This implies that if the software which is commissioned for has to work with other programs, it may need to be updated or upgraded before utilizing it. To avoid this issue, the software development agreement should include specific information on:

  • What upgrades are expected to be required in order to keep up with technological advancements?
  • Will the Company’s requirement for additional functionality be met through a maintenance contract or existing support services obligations?
  • Who will be in charge of updating and upgrading the system?

It’s also worth noting that most developers reserve the right to stop providing support and maintenance for any previous version of software if a newer version is made accessible to the Company (the client).

Support

Although some support provisions may be included in a software development agreement, it is more common for support services beyond the installation and testing phase to be charged separately, or to be quoted separately if acquired as an Annual Support Agreement.

If intended to add assistance provisions in the contract, it should be specified:

  • How will assistance be provided? (email, telephone, or in person).
  • The kind of issues that the support services will address.
  • Response times, particularly with regard to an Annual Support Agreement.
  • Any limitations on support services, as well as any services that may be subject to additional fees.

Project time and cost

This component establishes the agreement on the project’s completion schedule and cost.   Indicate the hourly rates, development phases, goals, and deadlines for each.

The agreement should also state who is responsible for the delays by both parties. The inclusion of any partial payments that have been agreed upon based on the development progress. Annexes to the contract, such as payment schedules or development plans, may be referred to. The both parties must mandatorily sign any supplemental documents.

 Compensation

The contract must state the total monetary consideration payable by the corporation to the developer, as well as the breakup, which is commonly stated on an hourly basis. Further, the developer must specify the time intervals during which recurring bills must be sent. Any details concerning the initial and subsequent payments must also be mentioned.

 Intellectual Property Rights

The contract should state that the company will be granted copyrights and other intellectual property rights in relation to the software, such as trademarks if applicable.

One of the most crucial sections of the software development contract is this one. The company owns the software created as a result of the project, which should be stated clearly in the contract. Make certain that the contract has the following provisions:

  • The source code should be owned by the company. By obtaining ownership of the source code, the company gains the ability to use or alter as it may see fit.
  • In the event of contract termination, the company immediately owns the code has been completed thus far.
  • All resources developed throughout the development process, including wireframes, drawings, and blueprints, must be destroyed.

The development business, on the other hand, can only reassign the rights to the property that they built. Any open-source tools that were utilized will be made available to the public.

 Further Changes

All information regarding the procedure for requesting changes to the software’s specifications must be provided. If the adjustments are appropriate, the developer may be required to accommodate them at no additional expense to the company. The corporation may also agree to provide additional pay in the future if major adjustments are implemented. It’s also possible to include provisions for reversing such changes.

Confidentiality

Confidentiality is one of the most important facets of a software development contract. The developer agrees not to provide any information about the company, its activities, or its clients to any third parties. In addition, the developer commits not to make copies of the software or distribute it to third parties.

While the Confidentiality part is standard in most service contracts, it is absolutely crucial in the information technology industry. Specify the information that is regarded confidential and the responsibility for the said disclosure.

The confidentiality terms in most software development contracts survive the contract itself, which means that the confidentiality should be maintained even after the contract is completed.

 Warranties from the developer

(a) The developer must guarantee that the program does not violate any agreements the developer has with third parties, and that it does not infringe on any third party’s intellectual property rights.

(b) The developer warrants that the program will run smoothly according to the company’s expectations and agrees to resolve any bugs that arise within the stated time frame. As the creator of the intellectual property, he or she must assign the rights to the corporation under the terms of the agreement.

(c) A disclaimer stating the developer is not responsible for any warranties not expressly stated in the contract may also be included.

Assignment

It should be mentioned that the developer may not delegate any contract rights to a third party without the company’s consent.

Indemnification

The developer undertakes to indemnify the company from any lawsuits that may occur as a result of the Developer’s infringement of third-party intellectual property rights.

No changes are permitted unless they are made in writing.

It should be mentioned that no amendment of the agreement will be permitted unless both parties agree.

Acknowledgements

The developer is an independent contractor, and the contract does not constitute any partnership, joint venture, employer-employee connection, or principal-agent relationship between the company and the developer.

It should also be noted that the contractual relationship will be one of “work for hire,” as defined by the Copyright Act of 1957.

Termination

The contract may specify the methods for terminating the agreement. It could be for particular reasons specified in the contract after giving the other party sufficient notice, such as a material breach of the contract’s terms or failing to perform any part of the contract. The non-breaching party has sole discretion over whether or not to cancel the agreement.

Jurisdiction in Cases of Dispute

The contract must state which court will have jurisdiction over any dispute arising from a breach of any of the provisions.

In the complicated realm of Intellectual Property Rights, a well-drafted Software Development Contract protects both the company’s and the developer’s rights and eliminates ambiguity.

Author: Vinita Gaud, Pravin Gandhi College of Law

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607

 

 

Safeguarding IP and NDA

A major chunk of a progressive company’s assets today is in the form of Intellectual property (IP) such as trademarks, patents, copyrights, trade secrets, designs and so on. Sharing of confidential information becomes unavoidable when two entities are transacting business. A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is also known as a confidentiality agreement and is an agreement where two or more parties agree to keep certain information confidential. In most situations, NDAs serve as the first move towards subsequent business agreements and contracts that include additional provisions covering the complexity of business transactions between the parties. This can either be one-sided (only one party shares confidential information) or mutual (expecting exchange of confidential information from both the parties) but the outcome of it is to protect the information or the businesses’ trade secret.

  1. Parties

It is very important to list out the party names correctly on an NDA as a relatively minor error such as forgetting to include the word “Limited” can have disastrous consequences. Some companies have different legal names and trade names when they begin their operations. A legal name is the name used by an entity when registering as a business, when signing official legal documents, and when dealing with governmental processes. A business name or a trading name however is the name a company uses for ads and sales and under which it performs its business with the public.  A party may have the same legal and trading name, but it is also entirely possible that they may not be the same.

Further, there is no legal protection to halt the use of a trade name by other companies unless the entity trademarks its name. It is therefore important to list both the legal and trade name of the businesses involved when drafting an NDA.

  1. Define what is deemed to be confidential information

Confidential information should be defined specifically for both parties. The parties involved must be precise when identifying the type of confidential information exchanged and whether it is the same or different for all parties. For example, the type of information to be shared by each party may not be the same in the case of a discussion involving the mutual exchange of confidential information between the two parties. Therefore in such cases, it makes sense to provide an exact definition of confidential information for each party.

Classifying all the information disclosed to a receiving party as confidential can be tempting. However, using catch-all clauses must be avoided and instead, the agreement should only include information that is truly necessary to keep a secret.

For example, in Trailer Leasing Co. v. Associates Commercial Corp, a federal court in Illinois declined to enforce an NDA where the concept of ‘confidential’ was deemed too vague, over and above a lack of specified geographical limitations.

The law treats confidential information differently than trade secrets and hence care must be taken to appropriately label the information as confidential information or a trade secret. A differentiator between the two is that trade secrets are known to last for a longer period of time across generations.

  1. Term of the agreement

The term of the NDA may or may not be the same as the term of contractual obligations and therefore it requires a specific definition of the term. Perpetual clauses should be avoided unless the same is in the context of the parties’ discussions. 

  1. Clearly define non-disclosure and non-use

The agreement should include separate provisions on non-disclosure and non-use in both types of NDA (mutual and one-sided). 

NDA clauses should be drafted so as to not create undesirable delays in discussions and negotiations. The business goal should always be given priority to the lawyers involved in drafting and negotiating NDAs and excessive clauses should be avoided while standard clauses in NDA should be given utmost importance. In the case of any problems, it is often best to adhere to the primary purpose of signing NDA, i.e. confidentiality and limiting the use of sensitive information, whereas additional agreements can be enforced to include relevant provisions (Non-compete, Non-solicited, IP Assignment, IP Licensing, etc.)

By Damini Mohan

Contact us at info@origiin.com to avail services in Patent, Trademark, Contracts, Patent Licensing, M&A

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel HERE

Email: info@origiin.com

Whatsapp: +91 7483806607

 

Essentials of an Intellectual Property Contract

Contracts are used to regulate and legitimize essentially all business transactions. They are, of course, appropriate instruments in contexts other than standard buy-sell and employment agreements. Any situation involving a reciprocal exchange of promises will almost always need the use of a formal, written contract. This is certainly relevant when significant intellectual property (IP) is under consideration. Contracts must be employed by companies with valuable IP to ensure that their internal employees and any external vendors or consultants who have access to their IP information act responsibly, regardless of the timing or duration of that access. Furthermore, corporations must clearly indicate who possesses the proprietary rights over the IPs to employees who are involved in or responsible for IP development.

The symbiotic link between copyright and contract law is examined in this article. The intellectual property bargain, or the delicate balance that purportedly exists in present IP laws, cannot simply be viewed as a matter of property laws stating a balance. A major characteristic of IP dispersed in the open market has always been the connection between IP and contract norms, and that interaction is central to whatever balance has been established. It is pointless to focus exclusively on the statutory provisions of copyright, patent, or trademark laws when discussing a current balance in the property rights sector. IP contracts deal with a wide variety of rights that can be assigned, or licensed to any other person or organization. It is necessary to grasp and incorporate the fact that the policy approach has always assumed that property rights are frequently transferred, waived, or released. The clauses adopted in such contracts, on the other hand, must be designed with extreme prudence and care.

Finally, firms can impose IP protection through a variety of contracts, including confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements, non-compete agreements, and property or assignment agreements, among others. Regardless of which contract is best for the situation, any IP-related contract must include the following provisions:

These are important factors in an IP contract that should be considered while drafting these agreements:

  • Confidentiality

To safeguard the owner, a confidentiality clause is required. Because there has been a significant increase in technological knowledge, further security measures must be taken to secure the work, and hence a secrecy provision prohibits and binds the other party from disclosing the creation’s integrity. Patents, copyright, and trademarks are instances of intellectual property that have been published and are thus publicly accessible. They are, however, frequently used in conjunction with other confidential know-how to generate commercial outcomes – and such sensitive know-how must be kept confidential.

Contractually requiring tight confidentiality is perhaps the most important part of any IP arrangement. Companies must be exceedingly proactive, take extraordinary security precautions, and remain watchful to potential intrusions or data misappropriation as technological innovation thrives and competition grows. Undoubtedly, despite a company’s investment in the most advanced security measures, essential IP can be exposed purposefully or inadvertently owing to human frailties.

As a result, a robust contract that explicitly imposes an obligation to maintain secrecy, as well as serious repercussions for failure to comply, will dissuade irresponsible and/or malevolent action. Employees who are aware of the potential consequences of disclosing a company’s information are significantly more likely to take the necessary safeguards and follow any IP-related security policy.

Confidential Information Access

Conditions for access to know-how and confidential information by parties’ employees, consultants, or representatives must be stated in order to safeguard confidentiality in a realistic manner. Standards for guaranteeing the security of secret information might also be stated.

  • Ownership of Intellectual Property Used or Created Over the Duration of the Relationship

The contract must state clearly who will be the owner of the intellectual property that is being used or constantly developed throughout the duration of relationship. Even if the connection is later terminated, the ownership status of the IP should be clearly stated. This is a common dispute in which an employee chooses to leave his job after the creation of the IP and wishes to take the creation with him on the assumption that it was developed by him. However, the fact that it was made while he was employed does not give him the right to own it, which must be expressly stated in every contract.

Disputes over IP often emerge when an individual resigns from the employment at the organization severs a relationship with external associates. Employees and consultants who contribute to the creation and development of IP may believe they have the right to take it with them when they depart. Even if this is acceptable to a corporation, it must be determined from the beginning to avoid costly misconceptions. In most circumstances, a business expects to keep ownership of whatever IP it develops. To avoid misunderstanding, this proprietary intent must be made abundantly explicit in any relevant contract.

  • Access

A contract must unambiguously indicate which individuals are authorized to access the IP, when they may access it, and for how long they will have access, in addition to declaring explicitly which party will retain property rights over the IP. In some situations, a non-compete agreement may prevent an employee from working in a related area for a period of time after leaving a company. However, the extent and length of any such agreement are limited, and a former employee may presume that he or she can still refer to IP information that was created with their participation. Even if a corporation grants such access to current or former employees, the manner in which such access is granted must be specified in a contract. Companies may, for instance, aim to make sure that information is accessed through a secure server or a tightly managed data repository. The requirements for access to IP within a corporation must be clearly specified.

  • Indemnification

IP indemnification on IP representations and warranties, can be used to hold a seller liable for violations of IP representations and warranties. These aren’t the only types of breaches that might trigger indemnity in a contract, but in contracts where IP may not be the main emphasis, the IP-related indemnification clauses can get neglected during negotiations, which can lead to dispute later if a claim occurs.

In discussions about IP indemnity, the scope and duration of indemnification should be addressed. The seller will aim to reduce the amount of time it can be held liable for indemnification, while the purchaser will seek a longer survival period. The seller will also wish to try to limit its indemnity liability, though this can be challenging. If there are restrictions in place for breaches of general representations, the seller may seek comparable caps for IP breaches, but the acquirer is more likely to push for a larger cap. Acquirers may also try to have specific matters exempted from the cap (i.e., fraud claims, and intentional breach). Control of claim defense is another area where IP indemnification is being negotiated. The seller may want to demand control considering he or she will be more compelled to resolve the claim if the acquirer has control and simply forwards the invoices to the seller.

In the event of an IP license, which may be a stand-alone agreement or a component of a larger agreement, indemnification terms may oblige the licensor to extend its IP protection to the licensee if and when a third-party IP dispute arises. It is critical for the indemnifier to understand what he is committing to indemnify, regardless of the type of IP matters that may be indemnified.

  • Recourse

A contract must clearly point out the consequences of any breach of the agreement in order to have the bite it requires. It will not be adequate to utilize vague descriptions like “such fines or litigation”. It must be apparent to the person who will be signing the agreement that the company takes the security of its IP very seriously and will aggressively pursue any and all legal remedies available. In the unfortunate event where valuable IP is misappropriated, there should be no ambiguity regarding the next course of action.

  • Intellectual Property Documentation and Records

Sophisticated contracts may include a system for recording and documenting the IP developed throughout the course of the relationship (e.g., by creating specialized lists) so that it can be identified. This allows for improved future valuation of IP and enhances the potential to monetize such property through full or partial assignment, depending on the interests of the parties.

  • Termination/ Breach of Contract

Contracts must explicitly specify the consequences of breaching the contract. Because a vague definition of such termination/cancellation/penalty clauses might lead to years-long tedious legal battles, an ironclad contract with respect to penalty clauses is required. There should be no ambiguity or vagueness in a contract.

Author: Vinita Gaud, Pravin Gandhi College of Law

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607

Essentials of an Employment Agreement

An employer-employee relationship is established, and the terms and conditions of employment are laid out in a legally binding contract known as an employment agreement. Although the Shops & Establishment Acts (“S&E Acts”) of a few Indian states, including Karnataka, mandate that an employer shall issue an appointment letter, neither the employment agreements nor the issuance of appointment letters is expressly required by the labour laws.  Typically, employers will write employment/appointment letters and complete employment contracts that explicitly state the terms and conditions of the employment. Important clauses of an Employment Agreement are as below:

  1. Roles and Responsibilities

It is important to make sure that the employer and the employee are on the same page with regard to what is expected from the employee. All the roles and responsibilities of the employees shall be expressly defined by the employer and clearly written in the employment agreement.

  1. Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality of the information

Employment Agreement typically includes a confidentiality clause to protect the employer’s proprietary information from the employee disclosure to or dissemination to third parties without authorization. An employee is required by this clause to take precautions to ensure that the information of the employer is kept confidential and is not disclosed to others, unless doing so is required by applicable law.  This provision safeguards the employer’s proprietary and confidential information and prohibits the employee from disclosing such information to any third party. These conditions might also stipulate that employee’s hand over all of their employer’s confidential documents and information when their employment ends.

A prohibition was imposed by the Delhi High Court in Burlington Home Shopping Pvt. Ltd. vs. Rajnish Chibber on the use of the client/customer list on any business, including the mail order business, which was included in the petitioner’s database.[1]

The defendant in Diljeet Titus v. Mr. Alfred A. Adebare and Others was an employee of the plaintiff’s company. The plaintiff’s client list and important confidential business information, including several proprietary drafts, were taken by the defendant after he was fired from his position as an attorney. The defendant argued that because he worked on the specific data while employed, he was the owner of the data and had copyright over it. The Delhi High Court rejected the defendant’s argument and determined that the plaintiff owned the information, which was unlawfully taken from the plaintiff, and which the defendant was prohibited from using. It should be noted that while the defendant was prohibited from using such confidential information, the Delhi High Court did not prevent the defendant from offering a comparable service.[2]

Penalties for confidentiality breaches and unauthorized disclosure are provided by the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and the Information Technology Act, 2000. With regard to the employee’s breach of confidentiality and disclosure, employers may also pursue remedies under Sections 66 (hacking), 43 (damaging computer systems), 65 (tampering with computer source documents), and 66E (punishment for violation of privacy policy) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

  1. Non-Solicitation

To prevent current or former employees from engaging in any business activities that would be against the interests of the employer, non-solicitation clause is often incorporated into employment agreements. This clause limits and forbids employees from interacting with coworkers or clients/customers of the employer for personal gain, either while they are employed or after they leave their positions. This provision is included to safeguard the employer’s commercial interests.

In the case of Embee Software Private Limited vs. Samir Kumar Shaw the Calcutta High Court ruled that “acts of soliciting committed by former employees take such active form that it induces the customers of the former employer to break their contract with the former employer and enter into a contract with the former employee, or prevents other persons from entering into contracts with the former employer, cannot be permitted”.[3]

  1. Non-Compete

In an employment contract, a non-compete clause is included to ensure that employees are prohibited from starting competing businesses both while they are employed and after their employment has ended. According to Section 27 of the Indian Contracts Act of 1872, “Every agreement by which anyone is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind, is to that extent void.” Additionally, every citizen of India has the freedom to engage in any profession, trade, or business, according to Article 19 (g) of the Indian Constitution. However, employers typically include this provision in employment contracts to safeguard the company’s trade secrets and confidential information. The question of how restrictions can be imposed on employees after their employment has ended arises because it is widely accepted that employees may be prohibited from starting businesses or engaging in activities that compete with the company’s operations while they are still employed.

The CEO of the company, Mr. Kumar Apurva, was prohibited by the court in Kumar Apurva v. Valuefirst Digital Media Pvt. Ltd. from engaging in any activity that is in competition with the company as well as from soliciting, interfering with, disturbing, or attempting to disturb the relationship between the company or subsidiary and third parties, including any customers or suppliers of the company or subsidiary.[4]

In Ozone Spa Pvt. Ltd. vs. Pure Fitness & Ors., the court barred the defendants from starting, operating, or establishing any rival businesses in any location that is within 4 kilometers of the plaintiff’s premises. However, Section 27 states that all agreements restricting the practice of any profession are void if they are made with the intent to defraud, mislead, or cause irreparable harm to the employer, trade, or business. Therefore, reasonable restrictions are allowed and do not invalidate the contract.[5]

As a result, the employers typically impose reasonable limitations on this clause to ensure the protection of both the company’s and the employee’s interests.

  1. Term and Termination

The nature of the establishment, its location, and the category of employees, are all relevant considerations when it comes to India’s labor laws regarding termination.  The Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 governs the dismissal of employees, and the S&E Acts of the relevant states govern the dismissal of non-employees.  The length of the notice period to be given upon termination of employment and the severance payments that would be due to an employee upon termination are set forth in the state-specific S&E Acts.

By tendering his or her resignation, an employee may voluntarily end the Agreement.  The clause specifically states the conditions and obligations that must be met by both the employer and the employee upon termination, as well as the length of notice that the employee must provide upon termination. A breach of the terms of the agreement, a false representation, fraud, misconduct, a failure to perform obligations and duties, among other things, may be grounds for such a termination of employment. A domestic investigation using natural justice principles should be conducted before any such termination. The employer will be required to complete a full and final settlement by paying the employee all statutory and contractual obligations.

Conclusion

Given the foregoing, it is advised that employment agreements be made between the employer and the employee and contain clauses outlining the terms and conditions of employment, both for the duration of employment as well as after termination of employment. The roles and responsibilities of the employees are outlined in employment agreements, giving the employees a clear understanding of what is expected of him or her both during the employment relationship and after it has ended.  Most importantly, an employment agreement protects the company by including provisions like confidentiality, non-compete, and non-solicitation. These restrictive covenants are crucial in protecting against unauthorized information disclosure, the solicitation of existing employees, and clients, and the establishment of any rival businesses that might harm the employer’s business. Typically, employers will give probationary employees an appointment letter to cover the duration of their employment, and once they are hired permanently, they will enter into an employment agreement with them.

REFERENCES:

[1] 61 (1995) DLT 6.

[2] 2006 (32) PTC 609 (Del).

[3] 2012(3)CHN250.

[4] 2015 SCC Online Del 8360.

[5] 2015 222 DLT 372.

Author: Adyasha Das, Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607

Indemnity Clause: Purpose, Commercial relevance

The phrase “Indemnity” may be described as a form of financial security or protection. In an indemnity claim, one party (“Indemnifier”) agrees to protect another party (“Indemnity Holder”) from any loss, expenditure, cost, damage, or other legal consequences resulting from the Indemnifier’s or any third party’s or event’s act or omission [1]. The essential premise of an indemnification provision in a contract is to transfer obligation from one party to another, in whole or in part [2].

An indemnification clause in a business contract is heavily disputed and negotiated. It is one of the mandatory provisions since it guarantees that the Indemnity Holder will be compensated for any damages incurred. The notion of indemnity is codified in Indian law under section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which defines it as “a contract by which one party promises to save the other from damage caused by the promisor’s or any other person’s action.”

Purpose of Indemnity Clause

According to Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, the claim of indemnity arises when a person (indemnifier) agrees or gives assurance to another person (indemnity holder) to save them from any form of loss or damage that has been caused to them by any action of the indemnifier promising such indemnification, or the acts/omissions of any third party who may not be a party to the contract. The provision of indemnity comes into application only when a previous guarantee is made to safeguard a party from the loss, as shown by the preceding definition. Only when there was an expectation of loss and a guarantee was made to suffer the loss does the issue of compensation emerge [3].

When a suit is filed against the indemnity holder or the indemnified, they may be forced to pay damages, fees, or other expenses. Similarly, if the indemnifier has promised to repay or indemnify the indemnity holder for damages, fees, or other expenses paid by the indemnity holder himself, he might file such suit against the indemnifier.

The court decided in Gajan Moreshwar Parelkar vs. Moreshwar Madan Mantri that if the indemnity-holder has incurred a responsibility that is absolute, he may ask the indemnifier to cover it.[4]

Relevance of Indemnity Clause

In a commercial contract, an indemnity is somewhat different than in common law. The indemnity clause is a typical feature in commercial contracts. The goal of including an indemnification provision in a contract is to transfer risk or expense from one party to the other. More specifically, it may protect a commercial transaction between two parties by requiring one side to pay the other sides expenditures in certain conditions.

In commercial contracts, indemnification provisions are structured broadly to include third parties whose activity, action, or carelessness may result in a loss or unexpected situations that are outside the standard conditions of breach actionable at common law. Even if there has been no violation of contract, indemnification provisions may apply in certain particular events or circumstances. In such instances, indemnities extend to unanticipated responsibilities that the common law may not otherwise impose.

IP and Indemnification

Given the high expenses of litigation, an indemnity agreement or provision for intellectual property (IP) may be quite beneficial. IP indemnification agreements assist to restrict a party’s risk and liabilities if infringement concerns come into fruition. In agreements between parties that want to transfer the risk of loss, IP indemnification clauses are prevalent. An existing indemnity provision in an IP agreement establishes which party bears the weight of the infringement risk in IP indemnification. The responsibility to “defend” and/or “hold harmless” the other party may also be included in an IP indemnification clause. In general, an indemnification agreement for IP requires one party to reimburse the other for losses or damages covered by the indemnity provision.

Intellectual property agreements may take many different forms. To minimise indemnity conflicts, it is important to specify the exact kind of IP rights when designing IP indemnification agreements, like Patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade dress, and other related IP rights. The kind of IP rights, as well as the exact conditions under which a party is not responsible for certain losses, should be clearly stated in indemnification agreements. Parties may wind themselves in indemnity disputes or, worse, fighting one other in IP indemnification action if there is no explicit indemnity term. IP indemnification provisions or IP hold harmless agreements that are well-drafted may shield one from the actions of the other party’s workers. They may also defend one against third-party allegations of IP infringement of different kinds. In a lawsuit initiated against a seller of infringing products, for example, an indemnified seller may move the defence of the lawsuit to the supplier. As a result, IP indemnity provisions are often included in agreements concerning IP rights.

Other major variables that impact IP Indemnification Clause coverage and liability include:

  1. Limitations of use: When a buyer or licensee mixes or changes a product or technology in such a manner that it exposes the buyer to infringement claims, additional concerns emerge. Sellers often try to lessen this risk by restricting responsibility for combinations and changes, as well as the parties’ compliance or non-compliance with specifications or directions for usage.
  2. Limitations on liability: Sellers are increasingly attempting to mitigate at least some of the buyer’s legal risk. To reduce this risk, sellers often use deductibles, liability limitations, co-payments, and proportional caps, among other responsibility restriction measures.
  3. Geographic restrictions: These may be used to limit the types of IP that might result in an indemnity claim and to exclude coverage for claims that occur outside of the intended or anticipated area of use or sale. These are particularly crucial when a contract calls for sub-licensees or downstream buyers/sellers to be indemnified.
  4. Multiple Indemnitors: Patent infringement cases often include complicated systems made up of several, separate goods or technologies. Recognizing and resolving concerns such as the responsibility of defence, the responsibility of bearing costs involved in such litigation process, etc. before a disagreement starts, may assist to prevent future conflict.
  5. Remedial measures: These clauses enable the seller to lessen damages by supplying the customer with non-infringing replacement products or services that perform similarly. Buyers and sellers alike benefit from remedial actions clauses.
  6. Pre-existing lawsuit threats: Sellers may seek to have any pre-existing litigation threats excluded from coverage unless they are disclosed to the seller before the underlying agreement is signed.

Conclusion

In most cases, indemnification provisions are derived from business agreements and are intended to safeguard particular commercial risks. Indemnity provisions are sometimes appropriate for the contract’s conditions or even required for the parties to fulfil their obligations. Before including an indemnity provision in a contract, it must be carefully drafted. A badly written indemnification provision might have serious implications. Due to ambiguity in the drafting of an indemnity clause, the indemnifier may not be held liable for losses that they expected it to cover. It’s critical to write the indemnification terms correctly and accurately. They are significant because they move the loss from one party to another, which may have been caused by the former’s carelessness. A well-written intellectual property indemnification agreement helps to distribute the legal risk associated with claimed IP rights violation. A successful IP indemnification clause will address the parties, their duties, and the mechanisms for commencing and satisfying those obligations, while no “magic words” are necessary. Both parties may decrease ambiguity and prevent possible disputes and lawsuits by addressing these problems during contract discussions in a product manufacturer/customer relationship.

Author: Sumedha Vadhulas, Symbiosis Law School Hyderabad.

REFERENCES:

[1] Keshwar Sao v. Guni Singh, AIR 1938 Pat 275.

[2] Daw Nyun v. Maung Nyi Pu, AIR 1938 Rang 359.

[3] Krishnaswani Iyer v. Thathia Raghavian chetty, AIR 1928 Mad 43.

[4] (1942) 44 BomLR 703.

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607

Important Agreements for Companies

The companies act defines a “company” under section 2(20) of the companies act of 2013 as an association of persons registered under the Companies Act 1956 in a partial manner) act 1956 or Companies Act 2013. In layman language, a company is defined as an association of persons or a conglomeration of persons who work towards a common objective. A company is a legal artificial person which possess the capability of being sued and to sue for any omission or commission of an act. The Companies Act of 2013 defined the constituents of a company in the case of Solomon versus A Solomon & Co[1], the court defines a company and its validity if the company is duly incorporated, it is an independent identity with its duties, rights and liabilities appropriate to itself.

However, it becomes essential for a company to engage in a variety of contracts to maintain its legal solidarity. On the other hand it becomes mandatory for employees to engage in the contracts to display allegiance and conformity with their company. Various legal agreements are signed and sanctions to minimize the risk of any legal liability. For a contract to be valid, the requisites given under the Indian Contract Act 1872 under section 2(e) of an offer, acceptance, free consent, promise, consideration, enforceability shall be fulfilled.

  • Memorandum of Understanding- MOU

A company requires to have its MOU with its partners and the partnership firm, mentioning the profits, losses, shares and dividends to determine limited legal partnership (LLP) or limited legal company (LLC). A memorandum of understanding is to ensure the involvement of every person in the assignment and making sure what the roles, duties and liabilities of each partner, employer and employee are stated clearly.

  • Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) & Confidentiality Agreement

For any company, it becomes a sine qua non to ensure that the employees, clients, associates, consultants, vendors and other members of the company enter into NDA agreements at various stages to maintain confidentiality of the information shared. Main purpose of NDA is to maintain the privacy, confidential information and sensitive information of the company which is required to be shared with others at various times.

  • Employees Contract and Offer Letter

An employers agreement or employers contract is an agreement between the employer and the employee to document terms and conditions agreed between the parties. A breach on the part of a party by any  action, omission or commission might result in a breach of contract.

Other working conditions such as wage, time and stocks, remunerations, appraisals, salary, etcetera are mentioned in the employment agreement. A Non- compete clause and non-solicitation clause is also engaged between employer and employees to prohibit joint ventures with other companies and to prevent poaching clients of other companies.

  • Service Agreement of Directors

The Directors’ service agreement resembles an employment agreement & it states the basic formalities and duties of the directors of the company when it comes to maintaining their company’s environment and health conditions. There are a few basic duties that the director of each company is obligated to perform towards its employers. This Agreement mentions the responsibility, duties, pay scale and liability- arrangements of the directors once the service is completed or rendered.

  • Pensions & Insurances

The EPFO (Employees Provident Fund Organization) makes it necessary for any organization or company that employs 20 or more employees who are registered under the Employees Provident Fund Act and Miscellaneous Provisions Act of 1952.

The EPFO is prevailing with three schemes, namely- The Employees Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 (EPF), the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 (EPS) and the Employee Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 (EDIL). If a company has more than 20 people, then as an employer one has to substantially keep a track under which scheme a company or employer can fall.

Moreover, ESI scheme is a social security scheme designed to protect employees (against disability, sickness, maternity or death) working in the organized sector by providing medical care and/or compensation to the insured and/or family members of the insured.

  • Termination Compensation

The Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 states the method and system (re-employment of end specialists, end arrangement, manager commitments, concept of conservation, etc.) to be taken after the end of representative administrations (conservation). Conservation implies disciplinary activity within the shape of end as discipline and such workers being ended are entitled to compensation as expressed within the Act.

  • Workmen’s Compensation

Any damage, illness or accident arising out of the course of work must be compensated for beneath the Workmen’s Emolument Act, 1923. This Act for the most part applies to people being eviscerated or murdered in work within the railroad, fabricating, development, mines, ranches, etc. (or any perilous work).

  • Equal Wages

Break even with Remuneration Equal compensation for all representatives independent of sexual orientation is represented by the Rise to Compensation Act, 1976. It is the obligation of the boss to forbid segregation in enrollment, arrangement, examinations, advancement, compensation, etc. This Act commands that each boss keeps up an enlist of representative subtle elements and documents.

Conclusion

These agreements are not exhaustive and there are several other agreements and contracts that a company might engage into as per the circumstances and requirements.

Author: Anushka Seemendra, ICFAI University, Dehradun.

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607

[1]  [1896] UKHL 1