Breach vs Material breach in a contract

Aug 29, 2024 | Contracts

A Contract aften has several provisions and terms agreed between the parties, depending upon purpose and the type of the Contract. The parties involved in the Contract must adhere to all the terms outlined in the contract. In a contract, both parties make promises to one another and failing to meet these obligations is regarded as a breach of contract. Each side promises to carry out a specific obligation, whether it is payment, delivery of goods, or services. When one party does not fulfil their end of the contract—in other words, they “fail to perform”—that party (known as the “breaching party”) has breached the contract.

There are two types of breach of contract:

• Material breach– which occurs when the contract is irreparably broken, and
• Immaterial breach– which is also known as a minor breach or simply a breach

While both types of breaches represent one party’s breach of the contract, only a material breach can result in actual damages or contract termination. In other words, the non-breaching party to a contract can only recover from a material breach. However, a significant difference exists between a minor oversight or failure to meet a small contractual detail and a complete [1]failure to fulfil any part of the contract. A major failure to perform is known as a material breach, while a failure to meet a more minor contractual obligation is considered a non-material breach.

A breach is considered material if its inability to perform is fundamental to the contractual contract[2]. When the purpose of the contract is not met and the contracting party does not receive the product or service for which they bargained and negotiated, this is considered a material breach.

The judge examined the concept of material breach in the case of National Power Plc v. United Gas Company Ltd (1998), [3]The court defined it as “a serious violation of any of the guilty party’s responsibilities.” Additionally, the judge ruled that failure to address a material breach within seven days would result in the termination of the contract.

On the contrary, a non-material breach occurs when a failure to perform is related to an irrelevant aspect of the contract, but the contract’s fundamental purpose has been fulfilled.

Examples of a Material breach

For instance, you own an event management business. Plans were in place for the catering crew to arrive early that day to set up for your Saturday night fundraising [4]dinner event. As per the terms of your contract, the caterer was to arrive at 4 p.m. and as a result, most of the food would have been ready for the dinner scheduled at 6 p.m. The caterers were unreachable and nowhere to be found when Saturday afternoon rolled around. When the company doesn’t respond and there’s no food, you decide to call off the fundraising event.

In this case, the contract was materially broken by the catering company. The quality of dinner served that evening made or broke your fundraiser. The caterer failed to show up, so you were forced to call off the event. The original intent behind entering the contract was thwarted by the catering company’s non-compliance.

Example of a breach/immaterial breach

A minor breach of a contract is called an immaterial breach. This kind of violation usually consists of a minor infraction that has no appreciable impact on the relationship. Although the other party may not have received what they had anticipated and the breach may be somewhat inconvenient, the variation does not nullify the contract or cause significant harm.

Let’s use the example of our fundraiser dinner from earlier. Let’s say, once more, that you hire a catering business to supply the food for a dinner fundraiser. According to the contract, the company must have the food mostly prepared by the time it arrives at 4 p.m. for the 6 p.m. dinner. The catering company informed you in the afternoon to let you know they’re running late and won’t be able to get to the event space until 5 p.m. However, the company guarantees that there won’t be a delay of more than fifteen minutes for dinner. The scheduled dinner is served at 6:15 p.m., and the caterer does arrive at 5 p.m.

Most likely, this breach would be regarded as unimportant as the caterers arrived late, so dinner was served later than scheduled. You were still able to conduct your event, and the dinner was still fully catered to all other specifications. Even though the situation was stressful, nothing significant changed in the end.

Consequences of a Material Breach

The consequences of a material breach of contract are significant and can have far-reaching implications.  Legal implications for the party failing to perform include.

 Lawsuits: The non-breaching party can sue for breach of contract. This could lead to a court case where the breaching party is held legally accountable for their failure to perform.

Court orders: Depending on the case, the court might order the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations, pay damages, or face other legal consequences.

Moreover, Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that every party that breaches the terms of a contract need to compensate the non-breaching party whose rights have been affected as a consequence of the actions of the breaching party.

The principle established in the case of Hadley v. Baxendale forms the basis for this section. The case involved a mill owner (the plaintiff) whose operations were halted due to a broken crankshaft. The defendants were transportation providers tasked with delivering a replacement part. Due to the defendants’ delay in delivery, the plaintiff did not receive the crankshaft on schedule.

The court’s ruling established two key principles:

1. In the event of a contract breach, the damages recoverable should be those that would naturally arise from such a breach under normal circumstances.
2. If a party seeks to claim special damages, they must demonstrate that the other party was made aware of the potential for such specific losses at the time the contract was formed.

This decision set a precedent for determining the extent of damages recoverable in contract law, particularly in distinguishing between general and special damages.

Additionally, Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, states that if a sum to be paid, in case of a breach, is mentioned in the contract then irrespective of actual damage caused or loss, the breaching party is liable to pay reasonable compensation, not exceeding the amount so mentioned in the contract. Accordingly, various types of damages can be sorted for by the aggrieved party.

Types of Damage

1. Compensatory damages compensate non-breaching parties for losses caused by the breach. The goal is to put the non-breaching party in the same position they would have been if the breach had not occurred.
2. Consequential damages, also known as special damages, are awarded for losses resulting from a breach, but not directly caused by it. They must be foreseeable and directly related to the breach.
3. Punitive damages may be awarded for egregious breaches to punish and deter future misconduct.

Effect on contract performance for the non-breaching party

1. Material breaches can significantly disrupt non-breaching parties’ business or personal plans.
2. The non-breaching party may incur additional costs to find alternative solutions or mitigate the impact of the breach.
3. The non-breaching party loses the benefit they would have received if the contract was completed as agreed.

It is critical for those facing a potential material breach situation to seek legal advice. Legal professionals can advise on the best course of action and help you navigate the complexities of contract law.

Remedies for a material breach of contract:

Legal actions available to the breached party- The party who was violated has the following different remedies at their disposal:

1. Filing a lawsuit for breach of contract: If someone breaks a contract and doesn’t fulfil their end of the bargain, the simplest line of action is to sue them.
2. Requesting a court order for specific performance: In some circumstances, particularly when monetary damages are insufficient, the non-breaching party may ask the court to compel the breaching party to carry out their obligations under the terms of the contract’s particular remedies, such as the termination of a contract
3. Contract termination: In the event of a material breach, the non-breaching party may end the contract. As a result, they are no longer bound by the contract in any way.
4. Recission of contract: This remedy voids the contract and attempts to put the non-breaching party back in the same situation as before the contract.

However, before you can terminate the contract or file for bankruptcy, you must give the other party notice that they have breached the contract. In your notice of breach, you should specify the nature of the breach, when it happened, and whether it can be remedied. Depending on the situation, trying to resolve the issue through negotiation may be more beneficial than filing for bankruptcy or terminating the contract.

Seeking payment or imposing obligations on performance:

1. Making a damage claim: To make up for the losses brought on by the breach, the non-breaching party may make a compensatory damage claim. These are intended to restore the non-breaching party to the same position that they would have occupied in the absence of the breach.
2. Enforcing the original terms of the contract: Where possible, the non-breaching party may pursue legal action to enforce the original terms of the contract if they still wish to see its terms fulfilled. When a significant violation happens, it’s critical to record all supporting documentation and consult a lawyer to determine the best course of action.

Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding the nature and consequences of contract breaches is crucial in business and legal contexts. Material breaches fundamentally undermine the contract’s purpose and can lead to significant legal and financial repercussions, including lawsuits, damages, and contract termination. On the other hand, immaterial breaches, while still violations, do not typically result in severe consequences. When faced with a potential breach, it’s essential to document the situation, communicate with the other party, and consider seeking legal advice. The remedies available to the non-breaching party, such as compensation or contract termination, depend on the breach’s severity and impact. Ultimately, clear understanding and careful handling of contract breaches are vital for protecting one’s interests and maintaining business relationships.

Author: Sanshia Rebello, Christ Deemed to be University

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607 

Understanding compensation and damages in the cases of breach of contract

Jun 26, 2024 | Contracts

Contracts have become increasingly pivotal due to the expansion of business and commercial transactions driven by our economy’s robust growth. Correspondingly, the number of contract disputes has risen in parallel with this expansion. Consequently, it has become essential to evaluate the remedies available to the parties in such circumstances, as the disagreement often stems from the parties’ failure to fulfill their obligations under the contract’s terms. One such remedy is the award of damages in cases of contract breach. Calculating the appropriate damages, however, requires the consideration of several key factors.[i] This article will examine the multifarious variables that must be taken into account when assessing damages, in accordance with the requirements of statutes and the various types of damages granted to the involved parties.

WHAT ARE DAMAGES?

The Indian Contract Act, 1872 does not provide a formal definition of damages. Nonetheless, damages represent a form of financial compensation awarded to the harmed party by the party that has breached the terms and conditions of the agreement. The underlying rationale for granting damages is to recompense the injured party for the losses they have incurred. Therefore, the party that violated the agreement pays damages to the party who was harmed.^[ii] In the case of Common Cause v. Union of India^[iii], the Hon’ble defined damages as “Damages are the pecuniary compensation, obtainable by success in an action, for a wrong which is either a tort or a breach of contract, the compensation being in the form of a lump sum which is awarded unconditionally”.

Furthermore, the Hon’ble Supreme Court also outlined three damages requirements in Organo Chemical Industries v. Union of India.^[iv] These requirements are as follows:

1. Harm Resulting from Wrongdoing: When an individual acts improperly or fails to fulfill their obligations, it inevitably leads to harm being inflicted upon another party.
2. Remuneration through Remedies: In such circumstances, the aggrieved individual deserves to be compensated for the damage they have endured as a result of the wrongful actions or omissions.
3. Calculating Damages: The damages awarded should be sufficient to not only cover the actual losses incurred by the aggrieved party, but also serve as a deterrent to discourage future misconduct by the breaching party.

By ensuring that the damages are calculated to adequately compensate the injured party and deter future breaches, the legal system can effectively uphold the sanctity of contractual agreements and provide a fair and equitable remedy for those who have been wronged.[v]

CONSEQUENCES OF BREACH OF CONTRACT

The Indian Contract Act of 1872 delineates the regulations pertaining to breach of contract within Sections 73 to 75. These sections outline the repercussions of breaching a contract and the criteria for granting damages.

1. Section 73: ^[vi] This section addresses the pursuit of damages in cases of contract breach resulting in harm. It stipulates that if a party fails to fulfill their contractual obligations, the aggrieved party is entitled to seek compensation. However, compensation is limited to the evident harm at the time of contract formation, excluding any concealed or consequential damages.
2. Section 74:^[vii] Section 74 pertains to the enforcement of penalties specified in the contract for breaches. Even in cases where the exact losses incurred are not quantifiable, the affected party can claim compensation up to the predetermined penalty amount stated in the contract.
3. Section 75:^[viii] Section 75 deals with claiming damages when one party terminates a contract due to the other party’s non-compliance. If a party terminates the agreement because the other party fails to fulfill their obligations, they are eligible to seek recompense for any losses suffered.

To delve deeper into this concept, let’s explore practical scenarios that exemplify the application of contractual provisions:

1. Nita’s Bathroom Renovation:

Nita engages a contractor to renovate her bathroom for Rs. 25,000. However, the contractor fails to complete the work within the agreed-upon timeframe, rendering the bathroom unusable. In this scenario, Nita has the right to seek compensation for the inconvenience and damages resulting from the contractor’s breach of contract.

1. Mohan’s Bike Rental:

Mohan rents a bike with a penalty clause of Rs. 500 per hour for late returns. Upon returning the bike six hours past the due time, Mohan incurs a penalty of Rs. 3000 as specified in the rental agreement. Despite the shop’s inability to precisely quantify the losses due to the delay, they are entitled to enforce the Rs. 3000 penalty in accordance with the contract.

1. Rahul’s Catering Mishap:

Rahul contracts a catering company for his daughter’s birthday party, agreeing on a menu and delivery time. However, the catering company fails to deliver the food on the event day, leading Rahul to arrange alternative catering at additional costs. Faced with disappointment and financial burden, Rahul decides to terminate the contract. Consequently, Rahul has the right to claim compensation from the catering company for the damages incurred due to their breach of contract.

These scenarios illustrate how breach of contract situations can unfold in real-life contexts, highlighting the importance of contractual provisions in safeguarding parties’ rights and providing remedies for breaches.

TYPES OF DAMAGES

The purpose for seeking damages dictates the type of damages pursued, leading to various categories of damages:

1. General and Special Damages:
   • General damages encompass compensation for losses naturally arising from the defendant’s misconduct, requiring no specific proof of the losses incurred. In contrast, special damages are tailored to compensate for anticipated losses under the contract, necessitating evidence of the actual loss suffered.[ix]
2. Nominal and Substantial Damages:
   • Nominal damages are awarded when there is a breach of contract without tangible financial harm, serving as a symbolic remedy. Conversely, substantial damages address losses that are challenging to quantify but are granted to reflect the severity of the breach and its repercussions.[x]
3. Exemplary and Aggravated Damages:
   • Aggravated damages compensate for additional harm caused by the defendant’s actions, beyond direct losses from the breach. Exemplary damages, also known as punitive damages, aim to penalize the defendant for egregious behaviour and deter future misconduct.
4. Liquidated and Unliquidated Damages:
   • Liquidated damages are predetermined amounts specified in the contract for breaches, while unliquidated damages are determined by the court based on the circumstances and projected losses, rather than being pre-established by the parties.[xi]
5. Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Damages:
   • Pecuniary damages are quantifiable by the court to assess the party’s financial harm or loss based on actual damages incurred. In contrast, non-pecuniary damages are challenging to quantify precisely due to their subjective nature, reflecting losses that are not easily measurable in monetary terms.

By understanding the nuances of these various categories of damages, parties involved in contractual disputes can navigate the complexities of seeking appropriate compensation for breaches and losses incurred.

CONCLUSION

The factors mentioned above present a dilemma for the courts in assessing damages. As a result, it’s crucial to consider these factors when determining damages and signing contracts. Because of this, it is recommended that, if feasible, the damages be included explicitly in the contract itself. Ultimately, this helps both parties avoid the cost of legal fees and avoid wasting time and resources on unnecessary litigation. As a result, extensive research must be done before creating a contract and be entered into diligently.

[i] Julie Amadeo, Justin Ben-Asher, James Carolan, Chris Paparella, Steptoe, New York Breach of Contract Damages, Bloomberg Law, (2020) https://www.steptoe.com/a/web/209139/3ZEZ74/new_york_breach_of_contract_damageseco73244.pdf.

^[ii] Types of Damages in Contract Law (Section 73 of Indian Contract Act), LAW CORNER (Jun. 31, 2021), https://lawcorner.in/types-of-damages-in-contract-law-section-73-of-indian-contract-act/.

^[iii] Common Cause v. Union of India, AIR 1999 DELHI 257.

^[iv] Organo Chemical Industries v. Union of India, 1979 AIR 1803.

[v] Susan Buckner, Breach of Contract and Lawsuit, FindLaw, (2023).

^[vi] Indian Contract Act, 1872, § 73, No. 09, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India).

^[vii] Indian Contract Act, 1872, § 74, No. 09, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India).

^[viii] Indian Contract Act, 1872, § 75, No. 09, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India).

[ix] Julie Amadeo, et. al, supra note 1.

[x] Pence Law Firm, P.C., Four Types Of Damages Available In A Breach Of Contract, https://pencelawok.com/blog/four-types-of-damages-available-in-a-breach-of-contract/.

[xi] Gierach Law Firm, LLC, 5 Types of Damages that may be awarded for a Breach of Contract, https://www.gierachlawfirm.com/5-types-of-damages-that-may-be-awarded-for-a-breach-of-contract/.

Author: Gayatri Singh, UPES, Dehradun

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607

Agreements which a Start-up Needs for Legal Protection

Mar 3, 2024 | Contracts

Starting a new business venture can be an exciting and challenging journey. As a budding start-up, it is crucial to lay a strong foundation by putting in place the necessary agreements to protect your interests legally. These agreements not only provide clarity between parties involved but also minimize potential risks, conflicts, and misunderstandings. In this article, we will explore some of the essential agreements that a start-up needs and discuss the key legal points associated with each.

Starting a new start-up can be an exciting and challenging endeavor. It requires determination, creativity, and a passion for your business idea. As you embark on this journey, it is crucial to recognize the importance of legal agreements in safeguarding your venture and ensuring its long-term success.

Legal agreements serve as the foundation of any business. They are a set of rules and guidelines that outline the rights, responsibilities, and obligations of the parties involved. Whether you are partnering with co-founders, seeking funding from investors, or collaborating with suppliers and vendors, having proper legal agreements in place is essential to protect your interests and mitigate potential risks.

1. Co-Founder Agreement

When launching a start-up with multiple founders, it is essential to establish a co-founder agreement. This agreement clarifies roles, responsibilities, ownership percentages, and outlines the process for dispute resolution. Key legal points to consider in this agreement include vesting schedules, intellectual property rights, confidentiality clauses, and non-compete clauses. It is crucial to involve legal professionals to ensure all aspects of co-founder relationships are adequately addressed. This agreement solidifies the relationship between the founding members and outlines each party’s roles, responsibilities, and ownership stakes. It addresses key issues such as equity distribution, decision-making processes, and mechanisms for resolving disputes. A well-drafted co-founder agreement can prevent conflicts and ensure everyone is aligned on the company’s vision, values, and objectives.

2. Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)

An NDA is necessary to protect your start-up’s confidential information when discussing business ideas, strategies, or any trade secrets with external parties. This agreement ensures that the recipient cannot disclose or misuse the confidential information shared. Legal points to consider when drafting an NDA include specifying the scope of information covered, the duration of the agreement, and the consequences of breaching the NDA. In the early stages, start-ups often rely on confidential information, trade secrets, and intellectual property to gain a competitive advantage. An NDA is a legally binding agreement that protects sensitive information by ensuring it remains confidential. It prevents partners, employees, and contractors from sharing or using proprietary information without proper authorization. An NDA helps establish trust, fosters innovation, and safeguards your startup’s most valuable assets.

3. Employee/Independent Contractor Agreements

When hiring employees or engaging with independent contractors, it is crucial to have written agreements in place. These agreements protect your start-up’s interests and clearly define the employment relationship. Legal points to consider in these agreements include job responsibilities, compensation, intellectual property assignment, confidentiality provisions, termination clauses, and non-compete obligations.

Employee agreements are essential for businesses that hire workers on a regular basis to perform specific tasks within the organization. These agreements establish the terms and conditions of employment, including job responsibilities, working hours, compensation, benefits, and termination procedures. By clearly outlining these details, employers can avoid misunderstandings and potential disputes that may arise down the line.

One of the primary reasons why employee agreements are crucial is that they establish the employer-employee relationship, ensuring that all parties are aware of their roles and responsibilities. This clarity reduces the likelihood of confusion and helps maintain a harmonious working environment. Furthermore, employee agreements provide employers with the legal framework to address issues related to intellectual property, confidentiality, and non-compete clauses. By including these provisions in the agreement, employers can protect their proprietary information and prevent employees from engaging in activities that may harm the company’s interests.

Additionally, employee agreements contribute to the overall compliance of the business with labour laws and regulations. These agreements typically cover important legal requirements, such as minimum wage, working hours, overtime pay, and benefits, ensuring that the company adheres to these standards. Failing to comply with labor laws can result in costly penalties and legal repercussions, which could be detrimental to the stability and reputation of the organization.

4. Terms of Service/End User License Agreement (EULA)

If your start-up provides software, applications, or any online services, having a Terms of Service or EULA is vital. This agreement outlines the terms and conditions which users must abide by when utilizing your product or service. Legal points to consider in this agreement include disclaimers, limitations of liability, intellectual property rights, data protection, and dispute resolution provisions.

TOS and EULAs explicitly outline the terms under which users can access and use the service. They cover a wide range of aspects, including user privacy, intellectual property rights, payment terms, and limitations of liability. By clearly defining these parameters, TOS and EULAs protect both parties from misunderstandings and help prevent legal issues.

Furthermore, these legal agreements help ensure the security and privacy of users’ personal information. With cyber threats and data breaches becoming increasingly common, it is crucial for service providers to establish robust privacy policies. TOS and EULAs disclose the types of personal information collected, the purposes for which it is used, and any third parties with whom it may be shared. This transparency enables users to make informed decisions about their privacy and helps build trust between the user and the service provider.

An often-overlooked aspect of TOS and EULAs is the protection they offer to the intellectual property rights of service providers. Whether it’s software code, copyrighted content, or trademarks, these legal agreements enforce the protection of these assets. By agreeing to the terms, users acknowledge that they do not have the right to copy, distribute, or modify the service provider’s intellectual property without explicit permission. This protection incentivizes innovations and creativity while discouraging unauthorized use and infringement.

5. Vendor/Supplier Agreements

As a start-up, you may rely on various vendors or suppliers for materials, resources, or services. Having written agreements with these parties ensures clarity and legal protection. Key legal points to consider in vendor/supplier agreements include the specifications of goods or services, payment terms, delivery schedules, warranties, indemnification clauses, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

One of the key reasons why vendor agreements are important is that they provide a solid legal foundation for your business relationships. By outlining the terms and conditions that govern the provision of goods or services, these agreements protect the interests of both parties involved. They ensure that there is clarity on issues such as payment terms, delivery schedules, quality standards, and intellectual property rights.

A well-drafted vendor agreement also helps to prevent disputes and disagreements. By clearly defining the expectations and obligations of each party, potential areas of conflict can be identified and addressed upfront. This helps to mitigate the risk of disagreements arising in the future, saving both time and resources.

6. Investor Agreements

Start-ups must also consider the importance of shareholder agreements. As your start-up grows and attracts investment, shareholders agreements become vital in protecting the rights of shareholders and dictating the governance of the company. These agreements establish rules for share transfers, dividend distribution, and the appointment of directors. They provide clarity and transparency, which helps maintain trust and harmony among shareholders. When seeking external funding for your start-up, investor agreements are crucial. These agreements outline the terms and conditions associated with the investment, including the ownership stake, voting rights, exit strategies, and other provisions to protect both the investor and the start-up. Legal points to consider in investor agreements include anti-dilution clauses, vesting schedules, and representations and warranties made by both parties.

7. Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement

Start-ups heavily rely on innovative ideas, designs, trademarks, and other intellectual property. An intellectual property assignment agreement ensures that any intellectual property developed by employees or contractors is transferred to the start-up. Legal points to consider in this agreement include specifically identifying the intellectual property being assigned, warranty provisions, and indemnification against any infringement claims.

By having these essential agreements in place, start-ups can protect themselves legally, mitigate risks, and ensure a smooth operation. It is crucial to consult with legal professionals experienced in start-up law to ensure all the necessary legal points are addressed adequately. Remember, investing time and effort into these agreements today will save you from potential legal headaches in the future.

In conclusion, starting a start-up is an exhilarating journey that requires careful planning and attention to legal matters. By implementing the necessary agreements mentioned above, start-ups can establish a solid legal foundation, protecting their interests, and fostering growth and success. Agreements are the backbone of a start-up’s legal framework and play a crucial role in protecting the interests of the company and its stakeholders. Co-founder agreements, employment agreements, intellectual property agreements, technology-related agreements, supplier and vendor contracts, investment agreements, and customer agreements are all essential for a start-up’s success. By having these agreements in place, start-ups can mitigate legal risks, establish clear expectations, and pave the way for growth and success in their industry.

Author: Jyoti Jain

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

Contract Management

Feb 25, 2024 | Contracts

In today’s interconnected world, contracts govern business and personal interactions, making contract management vital. From simple agreements to complex corporate deals, contracts underpin transactions and relationships. With increasing contract frequency and complexity, effective management is crucial. It ensures compliance, mitigates risks and enhances operational efficiency. Proficient contract management is indispensable for navigating modern business complexities.

In this article, we delve into the realm of contract management, exploring its significance, key components, challenges, and best practices.

What is Contract Management?

Contract management is the systematic process of handling all aspects of a contract, from its creation to its execution and eventual closure. It involves various activities such as drafting contracts, negotiating terms, obtaining approvals, tracking obligations, managing changes, ensuring compliance, and evaluating performance. Essentially, it’s about effectively overseeing the entire lifecycle of contracts to maximize value, minimize risks, and maintain positive relationships with all parties involved.

Importance of Contract Management 

Contract management is crucial for ensuring clarity and compliance in business transactions. It minimizes legal risks by outlining rights and obligations clearly. Efficient contract management enhances operational efficiency, streamlining processes from initiation to closure. It fosters trust and accountability among parties, facilitating smoother business relationships. Effective contract management maximizes value and minimizes risks, enabling organizations to achieve their goals efficiently and securely.

Key Stages of Contract Management

1. Contract Initiation: It begins by identifying the need for a contract, setting clear goals, and identifying the involved parties. This stage is crucial for outlining initial terms and conditions that will guide the contract’s development.

2. Contract Creation and Negotiation: This stage involves drafting the contract document, reviewing it thoroughly, and engaging in negotiations to ensure alignment with all parties’ interests. Redlining and discussions help refine terms, aiming for a consensus that benefits all stakeholders.
3. Contract Approval: After negotiations, the contract undergoes legal review to ensure compliance with laws and regulations. Stakeholder approval is then sought, and once obtained, the contract is formalized through authorized signatures, signaling readiness for execution.
4. Contract Execution: With all approvals secured, the contract enters the execution phase, where parties fulfill agreed-upon terms, deliver goods or services, and meet contractual obligations. This stage marks the implementation of the contract’s terms and conditions.

5. Contract Monitoring and Management: Beyond execution, ongoing monitoring is essential to ensure contract performance and compliance. This involves scrutinizing performance metrics, safeguarding compliance with terms, and promptly addressing any deviations or issues that arise.
6. Contract Renewal or Termination: Contracts have finite durations, leading to the evaluation of renewal, modification, or termination options. This stage involves assessing performance, renegotiating terms if necessary, and deciding on the appropriate course of action for the contract’s future.

Benefits of Contract Management

1. Efficiency: Contract management streamlines processes by leveraging software and automation, freeing up time for evaluating contract effectiveness and meeting expectations efficiently.
2. Business Improvement: Successful contract management provides valuable insights into negotiation strategies and cost-saving measures, driving overall business improvement and competitiveness in the market.
3. Risk Reduction: Clearly defined contractual terms mitigate legal and financial risks, empowering businesses to navigate uncertainties confidently and prudently.
4. Vendor Tracking: Contract management facilitates better communication and understanding between companies and vendors, fostering stronger relationships and enabling informed decision-making based on vendor performance evaluations.
5. Compliance Enforcement: Contracts serve as enforceable agreements, ensuring all parties fulfill their obligations, maintain transparency, and adhere to regulatory requirements, promoting trust and accountability in business dealings.

Challenges in Contract Management

1. Complexity: Contracts can be intricate, involving multiple parties, legal requirements, and technical specifications, making them challenging to manage effectively.
2. Compliance: Ensuring compliance with legal and regulatory standards across different jurisdictions adds complexity to contract management, requiring careful monitoring and documentation.
3. Communication: Effective communication among stakeholders, including legal teams, procurement, and vendors, is crucial for successful contract management but can be hindered by siloed information and inefficient processes.
4. Contract Renewals: Tracking contract expiration dates and negotiating renewals in a timely manner can be challenging, leading to potential disruptions in business operations or missed opportunities for cost savings.
5. Technology Adoption: Leveraging contract management software and automation tools can enhance efficiency, but implementing and integrating these technologies into existing workflows may present technical and organizational challenges.

Best Practices in Contract Management

1. Centralize and standardize agreements: Streamline contract creation by using standardized templates and pre-approved language. Centralize contracts in a searchable repository for easy access and secure storage, enhancing efficiency and legal compliance.
2. Set sensible key performance indicators (KPIs): Define KPIs aligned with organizational goals, such as contract creation and approval times. Utilize contract management solutions to track performance metrics and identify areas for improvement.
3. Track obligations: Ensure fulfillment of contractual obligations by implementing systems to track and monitor obligations throughout the contract lifecycle. Utilize contract management software to send timely reminders and prevent oversight of critical obligations.
4. Automate communications: Replace email-based communication with centralized contract management software to ensure real-time notifications and streamline stakeholder communication. Automate communication processes to enhance efficiency and reduce errors.

5. Utilize clickwrap and electronic signatures: Expedite contract signing processes by offering clickwrap and electronic signature options. Incorporate these options into contract management solutions to provide a seamless signing experience and reduce friction in high-volume contract transactions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, effective contract management is essential for navigating the intricacies of modern business relationships. By implementing best practices, addressing challenges, and leveraging technology, organizations can streamline processes, minimize risks, and maximize value throughout the contract lifecycle. From initiation to renewal or termination, meticulous attention to detail and strategic planning are crucial for ensuring successful outcomes. Mastering contract management drives efficiency and fosters positive relationships with stakeholders, enabling businesses to thrive in today’s dynamic landscape.

Author: Gayatri Singh, UPES Dehradun

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

Competency of Parties to a contract under Indian Contract Act, 1872

Jan 20, 2024 | Contracts

For an agreement to be valid, the first requirement is that an agreement must be made by parties who are competent to contract. This is laid down in sections 11 and 12 of the Act[1]. Section 11 states that the person who is competent to enter the contract. It provides that every person is competent to contract who is

 (i) Age of majority;

(ii) Sound mind and

(iii) Not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject.

1. Agreement by minors

 Minor is a person who has not attained the age of majority. In other words, a minor is a person who has not completed 18 years of his or her age except –

 (i) When the guardian of a minor’s property or person is appointed by court.

(ii) When the minor’s property is taken over by the court of the ward for management. In both cases, the age of the majority is 21 years. Following are the laws relating to an agreement by a minor: An agreement by a minor is void.

 A minor cannot bind himself by a contract, but he can make the other party contract to be bound to him under this contract. A minor can become a promisee or a payee or endorsee of the property. A minor’s contract cannot be ratified.  A minor is not personally liable for the supply of necessaries, but the minor’s property is liable for necessaries.

• Liability of minor is tort i.e. civil wrong.
• There can be no estoppel against a minor.
• A minor can be admitted to benefits of partnership and appointed as an agent.
• A minor can hold property.

2. Agreement by persons of unsound mind

Section 12 of the Act states what sound mind is for the purposes of the contracting.

 A person is said to be of sound mind to make a contract if, when he makes it, he can understand it and form a rational judgment as to its effect on his interest. When a person is of unsound mind but occasionally of sound mind can make a contract when he is of sound mind and vice versa. The unsoundness of mind may be due to idiocy, lunacy, insanity, drunkenness, contract by lunatic, contract by drunkard etc.

Impact of Incompetency

The foundation of a contract’s legality in India is established by the Indian Contract Act (ICA), 1872. The parties’ competency is one of the essential components of a legitimate contract. According to Section 11 of the Act, incompetence is the lack of one or more characteristics that a person needs in order to be able to make a legally enforceable agreement. For people and companies involved in contractual transactions, it is essential to comprehend how incompetency affects contracts under the ICA.

Key Categories of Incompetent Parties:

1. Minors: Individuals below the age of 18 (with exceptions) are considered minors. Generally, contracts entered into by minors are void, meaning they have no legal effect (Section 11). However, exceptions exist for:

Necessaries: Contracts for essential goods and services like food, clothing, and shelter are enforceable (Section 68).

Personal benefit contracts: Agreements like marriage or apprenticeship that directly benefit the minor can be valid.

Ratification: Minors can ratify contracts upon attaining majority, making them binding.

2. Persons of unsound mind: Individuals lacking the mental capacity to comprehend the contract’s nature and consequences are deemed incompetent. Contracts made during such periods are void (Section 12). However, exceptions include:

Lucid intervals: Agreements made during periods of sound mental state are valid.

Necessaries: Similar to minors, contracts for necessaries can be enforceable.

Ratification: Similar to minors, ratification upon regaining sound mind can validate the contract.

Impact of incompetency of contract

Void contracts: Contracts entered into by incompetent parties are generally void (except for mentioned exceptions). This means:

No legal obligations: Neither party is bound to fulfill the contract’s terms.

No enforcement: Courts cannot enforce void contracts.

Restitution: In some cases, courts may order restitution of property or benefits unjustly obtained due to incompetency.

In case of Mohiri Bibi v. Dharmodas Ghosh (1906)[2], A minor entered into a mortgage agreement for her deceased husband’s debt. The Privy Council held the contract void, emphasizing that contracts by minors are generally unenforceable, even for debts, unless they fall under the necessaries exception.

In another case of Amar Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1957)[3], A contract for necessaries with a person of unsound mind was held enforceable, reiterating the exception for essential goods and services.

Conclusion

Understanding the impact of incompetency on contracts under the ICA is crucial for safeguarding legal interests. Parties entering agreements should exercise due diligence to ascertain the other party’s competency. If faced with situations involving incompetency, seeking legal advice promptly is highly recommended to navigate the complexities and protect your rights.

Landmark cases like Mohiri Bibi and the Amar Singh case illustrate the practical application of the ICA and highlight the exceptions and nuances associated with each category.

Author: Chandan Jhinkwan, Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT Karagpur

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

Important Clauses of a Business Contract

Sep 17, 2023 | Contracts

Business contracts serve as legally binding agreements outlining terms for transactions like partnerships, leases, and licensing deals. Within these contracts, clauses specify each party’s rights, obligations, and remedies, clarifying terms and managing risks. While contract clauses vary, certain essential ones, such as dispute resolution, indemnification, warranties, termination, limitations of liability, and confidentiality, are universally vital. These clauses define obligations, safeguard interests, and ensure contract enforceability.

In this article, we explore the significance and nuances of these important clauses within business contracts.

Important Contract Clauses

1. Indemnification Clause

The indemnification clause is a cornerstone of business contracts, allocating risks and protecting parties from potential legal liabilities. It outlines the procedures for compensating one party (the indemnified party) for specific expenses or losses incurred due to actions or omissions of the other party (the indemnifying party).

By clearly delineating responsibilities and liabilities, this clause helps maintain clarity and accountability in contractual relationships. It enables parties to negotiate and agree upon acceptable levels of risk, providing a framework for resolving disputes and minimizing the potential for costly litigation.

2. Force Majeure Clause 

Incorporating a force majeure clause is essential for addressing unforeseeable events or circumstances that may hinder the performance of contractual obligations. This clause typically excuses parties from fulfilling their contractual duties in the event of “acts of God” such as natural disasters, wars, or government actions beyond their control.

By specifying the conditions under which performance may be suspended or excused, the force majeure clause helps mitigate the risks associated with unpredictable events, ensuring fairness and equity in contractual arrangements.

3. Limitations on Liability Clause

The limitations on the liability clause play a crucial role in defining the extent of financial responsibility each party assumes under the contract. It sets forth the maximum amount of damages or losses for which a party can be held liable in the event of breaches, negligence, or other contractual violations.

By capping potential liabilities and specifying the types of damages recoverable, this clause provides certainty and predictability, reducing the risk of excessive financial exposure and facilitating smoother dispute resolution processes.

4. Confidentiality Clause

Including a confidentiality clause is essential for safeguarding sensitive information and proprietary data exchanged between parties during the course of the contract. This clause imposes obligations on both parties to maintain the confidentiality of confidential information and restrict its use or disclosure to authorised individuals.

By establishing clear guidelines for handling confidential information, the confidentiality clause helps protect trade secrets, intellectual property, and other valuable assets, fostering trust and preserving competitive advantage.

5. Copyright Clause

The copyright clause protects the contracting parties’ intellectual property rights, particularly in transactions involving creating or using copyrighted materials. It explicitly states the ownership rights, usage permissions, and restrictions related to copyrighted works exchanged or developed under the contract.

By acknowledging and respecting the copyright ownership of creative works, this clause helps prevent unauthorized use or infringement, ensuring compliance with intellectual property laws and preserving the integrity of original creations.

6. Termination Clause

The termination clause outlines the conditions and procedures for terminating the contract before its natural expiration. It may specify various grounds for termination, such as breach of contract, insolvency, or mutual agreement between the parties. Additionally, the clause often includes provisions regarding notice periods, termination fees, and post-termination obligations.

By providing a clear mechanism for ending the contract, the termination clause enhances certainty, reduces ambiguity, and protects the interests of both parties in the event of unforeseen circumstances or dissatisfaction with the contractual relationship.

7. Dispute Resolution Clause

The dispute resolution clause is a fundamental component of business contracts, outlining the procedures for resolving conflicts or disagreements that may arise during the contractual relationship. This clause typically establishes the methods, such as negotiation, mediation, or arbitration, by which parties attempt to resolve disputes before resorting to litigation.

By providing a structured framework for promptly and efficiently addressing conflicts, the dispute resolution clause promotes fairness, preserves relationships, and minimises the costs and disruptions associated with formal legal proceedings. Additionally, it helps parties maintain control over the resolution process and tailor solutions to their specific needs and circumstances.

8. Warranties and Disclaimers Clause

The warranties and disclaimers clause defines the parties’ rights, responsibilities, and expectations regarding the quality, performance, and fitness of the goods or services provided under the contract. This clause may include explicit assurances or guarantees made by one party regarding the characteristics or attributes of the products or services and any limitations or exclusions of liability for certain types of damages or losses.

By clarifying the scope of warranties and delineating the extent of liability, the clause helps manage risk, establish accountability, and protect parties from potential legal claims arising from breaches of contract or product defects. Additionally, it promotes transparency, fosters trust and facilitates informed decision-making by ensuring that parties are fully aware of their rights and obligations under the contract.

Conclusion

In conclusion, these crucial contract clauses are essential for drafting comprehensive and effective business agreements. From indemnification and limitations on liability to confidentiality and termination provisions, each serves to define rights, obligations, and protections for all parties involved. By carefully incorporating these clauses, businesses can mitigate risks, promote fairness, and ensure enforceability in their contractual relationships. Overall, a well-drafted contract with these essential clauses minimizes legal disputes, and fosters trust, transparency, and successful partnerships in the business world.

Author: Gayatri Singh, UPES Dehradun

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607

Contract Law: A Comprehensive Study on Reciprocal Promises

Jul 19, 2022 | Contracts

Section 2(f) of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 says that “Promises which form the consideration or part of the consideration for each other, are called Reciprocal Promises”.[1] In essence, this implies that promises exchanged in a contract are referred to as reciprocal promises. When multiple promises must be fulfilled concurrently, the promisor is not required to fulfil them unless the promisee is prepared and willing to fulfil his end of the bargain.[2] This principle has been established under Section 51.

For example, If Party A and Party B sign a contract wherein A will deliver particular goods to B and the payment shall be made in cash upon delivery, then there is no obligation on A to deliver the aforementioned goods unless they see a willingness on the side of B to make the payment in cash.

In the majority of business contracts, two or more parties normally agree to fulfil certain responsibilities toward one another. Such responsibilities may take the form of reciprocal promises, which are assurances that provide some or all of the consideration for one another. In other words, the performance of the responsibility of a party is conditional upon the other party completing their own. The notable clauses with respect to reciprocal promises are Sections 51 to 54 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872. While Sections 51 and 52 describe the various circumstances in which a reciprocal promise may be applicable, Sections 53 and 54 deal with instances in which one party breaches its responsibility.

Background

Contracts are the foundations for many agreements. Contracts often include one party promising to do something in exchange for the other party performing another act. However, parties to contracts sometimes only agree to take particular actions or make promises to take certain actions. Promises are not tangible, in contrast to an act. As a result, several questions may arise because of its nature. One is considered to make a proposal when he or she indicates their will to do (or not do) something. A proposal becomes a promise when it is accepted by the other party (to whom it is offered). In this case, the one who makes the proposal is the “promisor” and the individual to whom this proposal is made to is the “promisee”. The act of the promise is known as “consideration of the promise” when the promisee acts in accordance with the promisor’s wishes and either fulfils the promise or refuses to fulfil it. An agreement is created by these promises. Reciprocal promises are the kind of promises that make up an agreement.

Consideration and Promise

Under Section 2(d) of the Act, it states that consideration occurs when the promisor makes a promise to do or not do anything; this action is referred to as consideration of the promise. Reciprocal Promises is the term used when such promises constitute an agreement. Reciprocal promises are a portion of the consideration or make up the consideration for the contract, as stated in section 2(f) of The Indian Contract Act. A promise for a promise that creates an agreement is called a reciprocal promise.

A question may arise as to whether every consideration can be considered as a reciprocal promise. Consideration is typically referred to as a reciprocal promise since it is a promise made by the promisee to the promisor as part of an agreement. Similar to reciprocal promises, consideration is a promise for a promise and a reciprocal promise is a promise for a promise, however specifics will depend on the circumstances and nature of the transaction.  Consideration may include cost or some value in exchange for the promise as a consideration. Each transaction may include a different amount of consideration. As an illustration, consider money or a commitment as consideration to do or not do anything.

To answer another question as to whether every reciprocal promise is a consideration, reciprocal promises are not regarded as consideration. Reciprocal promises are a list of commitments made by both parties to a contract. Reciprocal promises create agreements. However, depending on the transactions occurring, there could be exceptions to the statement.

Types of Reciprocal Promises

1. Mutual and Independent

Although not protected by the Act, this idea has developed via jurisprudence. It requires the contracting parties to carry out certain duties independently of one another, and their execution is not reliant on the other party carrying out its obligations under the agreement. However, the contract requires the fulfilment of these separate and overlapping obligations.

For example, let’s say that “A,” a government organization, and “B,” a private contractor, enter into a contract for “B” to construct a bridge. If such a contract requires “A” to disclose information on, for instance, power projects to “B,” but such information has no bearing on building the bridge, then “B” will not be released from fulfilling its commitment to build the bridge simply because “A” did not provide the pertinent information. Although they are mutual and independent, the two pledges made by the parties to one another are binding. In fact, even if “B” falters on the bridge construction, “A” will still be required to divulge information about the power projects. However, even if the aforementioned two commitments are mutual and independent, the contract’s conditions would be maintained if it specified that they must be fulfilled in a specific sequence.

 In the landmark case of Mrs. Saradamani Kandappan vs. Mrs. S. Rajalakshmi and Ors[3], The Supreme Court affirmed the provisions of the agreement and acknowledged the mutual and independent nature of the reciprocal promises. Rajalakshmi and Saradamani had struck a deal for the purchase of a plot of property, which required a number of monthly payments. Prior to making the final payment, Saradamani requested that Rajalakshmi present the title paperwork. Saradamani failed to make the last payment as a result of Rajalakshmi’s refusal. Rajalakshmi cancelled the contract as a result of the last instalment not being paid on time. Following litigation in many venues, the Supreme Court ruled that the two promises—paying the last instalment and displaying the title documents—were mutually incompatible. Saradamani had brought a lawsuit for a particular performance. It also ruled that Saradamani’s reluctance to pay was improper since the contract did not stipulate that the buyer must first examine the title papers before making payment. However, the Supreme Court determined that the contract was dissolved because of the passing of time and ordered Rajalakshmi to refund the money she got from Saradamani.

2. Concurrent

This is a typical instance of a reciprocal commitment when the parties are required to carry out their duties overtly or implicitly concurrently. If the other party is not “ready” and “willing” to carry out its responsibility, the party willing to execute its promise will be excused from doing so.

For example, in the previously provided example, if “A” was required to engage vendors through a tender process to source some raw materials for “B,” including those sourced by “B,” then “B” might discharge itself from completing its commitment if “A” was not “ready” and “willing” to issue bids on time. In this example, simultaneous fulfilment of “A’s” and “B’s” reciprocal promises is essential to the contract’s successful completion. The Supreme Court ruled in J.P. Builders v. A. Ramadas Rao[4] that “readiness” relates to financial capability and “willingness” refers to the behaviour of the person that is seeking performance, and that typically the former is supported by the latter.

3. Conditional

This is the most typical kind of reciprocal promise, and it nearly always becomes a point of contention anytime there is a disagreement over a government contract that has been broken. According to this, the performance of one party is dependent upon the other party fulfilling a duty. The first party would not be able to keep its promise if the second party did not carry out its duties in line with the contract. Whether or not a promise is deemed conditional depends on the specifics of each situation.

For example, resuming the earlier example, if the contract between “A” and “B” also provided that “A” would construct a road leading to the proposed bridge in order to allow “B” to transport large machinery and equipment to the site, then “A’s” breach of this obligation would have an effect on “B’s” ability to fulfil its portion of the agreement. The transaction would still be seen as a reciprocal commitment owing to its fundamental nature and purpose, i.e., without the road, construction on the bridge cannot begin. Even if the contract did not clearly state that building the road is a precondition to beginning work on the bridge.

In M/s Shanti Builders vs. CIBA Industrial Workers’ Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd.[5] , a disagreement erupted over certain construction work that Shanti Builders was required to do. According to CIBA, Shanti Builders failed to finish the building work in line with the contract, which caused significant losses for them. On the other side, Shanti Builders claimed that it had not received a plot of land as the contractually required payment for the building work that had already been finished and that it would be unable to proceed with the next stage of the project unless such payment was made. The court backed Shanti Builders’ arguments after hearing from the parties and adopted the stance that if the fulfilment of a contract calls for a specific sequence (even if it is not expressly specified), then such sequence must always be followed. It also ruled that in cases where reciprocal pledges are reliant on one another, one party cannot demand the fulfilment of a promise if the other has not fulfilled its own.

Consequences to default

When a contract contains reciprocal promises, which means that one of them cannot be performed or that its performance cannot be claimed until the other has been fulfilled, and the promisor of the last-mentioned promise breaks that promise, that promisor cannot claim the fulfilment of the reciprocal promise and must instead compensate the other party to the contract for any losses that such other party may incur as a result of the contract’s non-performance.

For Example, A hires B’s ship to transport cargo from Bombay to Mauritius that B will furnish, with B getting a certain freight in exchange for transporting the cargo. A does not supply the ship with any cargo. A cannot demand that B fulfil his commitment, and must instead seek recompense from B for the harm that B suffers as a result of the contract’s non-performance.

Conclusion

Commercial contracts sometimes include reciprocal promises, particularly those that include the government, such as those for energy, infrastructure, etc. Courts frequently wrestle with contracts that contain reciprocal promises and have invalidated arbitral decisions made under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act due to an incorrect interpretation of reciprocity, underscoring the fundamental significance of this concept. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehend the subtleties of the interpretation, ramifications, and degree of responsibility placed on each side by such reciprocal promises.

Author: Ankitha Amby, Faculty of Law, PES University

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

Significance of arbitration clause in contracts: The Indian perspective

Sep 9, 2021 | Contracts

Disputes are an intrinsic component of the legal system, arising from variances in understanding, implementation, violation of obligations, infringement of rights, or unexpected events. In the Indian context, it is crucial to effectively resolve contractual disputes to preserve an ideal business environment in a country undergoing fast economic growth and increased corporate operations. Nevertheless, the existing legal system needs assistance to provide prompt decisions. The court procedures are widely known for their lengthy duration, sometimes extending the pursuit of justice beyond reasonable time limits. Although settling conflicts in court is not intrinsically fruitless, the excessive number of cases overwhelms the legal system, resulting in harmful problems such as significant delays, extensive backlogs, and costly litigation costs. This is especially problematic in contractual disputes, as even minor issues can snowball into protracted legal conflicts.

In such a setting to solve these apparent flaws, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) emerges as a viable route, delivering quick and cost-effective justice. This very idea has been present in India in the form of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Mediation Act, 2023, and even Section 89 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, where the Courts encourage individuals to resolve conflicts under the ADR process, which is a time-saving mechanism that aids to resolves issues quicker than court hearings, ensuring speedy resolutions, where proceedings occur privately, fees and expenses are less, and its scheduling is adaptable. Moreover, a neutral third party oversees ADR proceedings.

Today, this very mechanism is incorporated by individuals in their commercial agreement, as a dispute resolution clause, which may consist of methods like conciliation, mediation, negotiation, or arbitration, to avoid early and needless court actions.

Significance of Arbitration

Even if conciliation, mediation, or discussion are considerably more flexible and efficient than arbitration, individuals who adopt a dispute resolution clause in contracts prefer arbitration because not only can the parties pick an arbitrator to evaluate the evidence but also the decision carried out in arbitration have legal enforceability, making it legible and effective with limited options of review or appeal. As part of their crystallized dispute resolution policy, up to 91% of businesses prefer arbitration to litigation to resolve disputes, according to a report by PwC India[1].

Arbitration may seem identical to any court proceeding. However, there is more to arbitration than the selection of an arbitrator and the presence of legally binding force. Unlike litigation, the dispute resolution procedure is less stringent, and the judge/arbitrator  may not hear any other case simultaneously, allowing arbitration to be concluded more swiftly. Moreover, arbitration can incorporate a degree of bargaining, providing the arbitrator greater freedom in their final arbitral award decision; apart from that, this approach is prevalent in commercial disputes and other industries such as securities, labor, employment, and construction. In international contracts, arbitration has been a preferred means of dispute resolution, and most crucially, it helps prevent class-action lawsuits. In brief, parties add arbitration clauses to handle future conflicts swiftly and cost-effectively.

Conditions for Arbitration Clause in a Contract

As per Section 7(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ‘”arbitration agreement” means an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not.’ As per Section 7(2), an arbitration agreement may be in the form of an arbitration clause in a contract or the form of a separate agreement. However, there is no universally applicable format for arbitration clauses in contracts and simply mentioning an arbitration clause is not sufficient, for a contract to fully benefit from arbitration. Therefore, to optimize the likelihood of effective and efficient dispute resolution through the translation of an interest or dispute into an arbitration clause, it is critical to strategically ascertain the client’s interest in the dispute, the contract’s characteristics, the parties involved, the types of conflicts that are probable to arise, and the countries that are likely to be involved in any potential dispute. Additionally, comprehension of circumstances that may necessitate extraordinary provisions—such as temporary relief, confidentiality, and other critical matters—might be required. In conclusion, every arbitration clause must be suitably crafted by the specific circumstances, criteria, and parties involved in the dispute. A hastily drafted arbitration clause can potentially develop into a pathological provision that is unenforceable or requires clarification, resulting in costly and time-consuming legal conflicts.

Arbitration clauses can be drafted in 3 ways: primary, general, and complex clauses, depending on the type of contract, which include:

1. Primary clauses are essential terms required for a sustainable arbitration agreement, commonly contained in institutional model agreements.
2. General clauses: These are typically used in contracts involving significant transactions, where extra elements are provided beyond the opening phrases, addressing specific matters including venue, language, and governing law.
3. Complex clauses: These consist of elements beyond primary clauses, such as confidentiality, discovery, multi-party arbitration, and waiving of appeals. They require careful adaptation to prevent discrepancies and maintain validity across jurisdictions.

Other requirements may include that the arbitration agreement must be written.

Independence of Arbitration agreement

If a contract refers to a document containing an arbitration clause, and the contract is in writing, then that arbitration clause is considered part of the contract, as per Section 7 (3) and (4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. However as per the Doctrine of Severability, if a small part of a law doesn’t follow the parent law, the court can remove that part and keep the rest of the law intact. Under the same instance as well, as per Section 16(a) and (b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the arbitration provision in a contract is viewed as different from the primary contract itself and consequently remains valid even if the contract expires or becomes null and void. Similarly, even if both parties mutually terminate the arbitration agreement, still in case of disputes involving the primary agreement’s/ primary contract terms or subject matter, dispute will be handled by arbitration, as stated in the case of Ashok Thapar v. Tarang Exports (P) Ltd, (2018).[2] Thus the arbitration clause, a distinct agreement in the contract, exists independently from its other clauses. Despite of this, the ultimate resolve depends upon the nature of the controversy and its effect upon the existence or survival of the contract itself, as provided in the case of Mulheim Pipecoatings Gmbh v. Welspun Fintrade Ltd,(2013)[3].

Conclusion

From the detailed analysis presented in the text, it’s clear that the significance of arbitration clauses in contracts is multifaceted and substantial. They provide a structured path for resolving conflicts, enhance contract enforceability, and protect all parties’ interests, making it valid and legally robust. Moreover, being independent of the contract itself, the enforceability of the arbitration process remains intact even if parts of the contract are disputed or nullified.

But even so, the effectiveness of an arbitration clause and its value in commercial agreements greatly depends on its meticulous drafting, which could include constituents such as the governing law, the seat of arbitration, the appointment of the arbitrator, or the language. Such a well-crafted arbitration clause, tailored to the specific needs and contexts of the parties and the nature of the contract, is essential to ensure that disputes are resolved efficiently without further complications. The potential pitfalls of poorly drafted clauses—such as being unenforceable or requiring extensive legal interpretation—are highlighted and encourage the need for precision and foresight in contractual drafting.

Thus, such clauses must be comprehensive and customized to address all potential issues, ensuring that arbitration is an efficient alternative to traditional litigation and supports India’s broader economic and legal environments

[1]AK492- May 2013 Corporate Attitudes & Practices.indd-https://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/publications/2013/corporate-attributes-and-practices-towards-arbitration-in-india.pdf

[2] (2018) SCC Online Bom 1489

[3] (2013)SCC Online Bom 1048

Author: Gautam Bhatia, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

The Essential Aspects of Software Development Contract

Feb 16, 2021 | Contracts

A Software Development Contract is a contract between a corporation and a software developer in which the firm expresses its concepts and requirements. The developer then proceeds to design the software according to the company’s schedule constraints.

Such agreements are common in software organizations where developers are contracted to create computer software for both commercial and private use. As a result, it’s critical to determine the parameters of both developers’ and companies’ rights in relation to software.

A software development agreement is a contract in which one party (the Developer) undertakes to develop software for another party (the Client or the Company). While design and development procedures differ based on the complexity of the project and the team employed, there are a few important issues that are universally applicable and should be taken into account while negotiating the contract.

A written development agreement can be thought of as a road map. It will prevent disagreements if it is effectively drafted. It will provide solutions to problems if they arise. If the parties get into a disagreement, it will determine their legal obligations to each other. To create a software development contract, what is necessary is an understanding of the potential complexities.  This article outlines the most crucial aspects of a software development agreement. 

What are the Ingredients of a Software Development Contract? The following information is commonly engraved in a software development contract:

 Duties of the developer

All of the developer’s responsibilities must be outlined in the contract, including:

1. Software development in accordance with the company’s Software Requirements Specifications and in accordance with the company’s milestones at various stages.
2. Answering concerns regarding the program for a specified period of time following delivery.
3. The developer must also acknowledge the company’s right to terminate the contract if the developer violates the terms and conditions of the contract.
4. The limit of support to be offered by the company and the time period for completion of the project.

Services to be offered

The contract should define the development services expected from the partner. This section of the contract usually relates to the contract’s specification, which is an inherent aspect of it. The project scope that is to be delivered should be clearly stated in the specification. Try to issue the specifications in as much detail as possible to safeguard both the parties from conflicts.

The mechanism for changing the scope should also be described in the Services section. Any changes recommended by any party should be made in writing, in accordance to good practice. The  addition of a statement indicating that any change request must include the following information:

• Description of the change
• The impact of the modification on the project’s cost and timeline.

Acceptance

The acceptance period after delivery may be specified, during which the company can assess and test the software to ensure that it is completely compliant with the specifications. When the developer provides a product that meets all of the specifications, the delivery is considered complete. A Rejection clause could be introduced, allowing the corporation to reject the product if the software does not meet their specifications or if the developer is unable to deliver the complete product. The refusal must be written down.

Acceptance testing 

Specify whether acceptance testing will be performed on the developer’s end or by the vendor. Acceptance testing is typically performed at the conclusion of each development phase, so this section may also refer to the detailed project plan.

The contract should state in the context of acceptance testing:

• Who conducts the tests?
• The length of time it takes to complete the tests
• The manner in which test findings are communicated (the best way is to notify the other side in writing about the acceptance) 

Specifics on delivery

The contract must state the date by which the software must be completely functional and correspond to the standards, as well as:

1. The developer’s corrections in the event of non-conformity in certain areas of the finished product. And,
2. The manner by which the company will notify the developer if any non-conformity is discovered.

Training

The developer’s obligations for training the corporate personnel in the usage of the software, as well as the approximate hours of training and the location of training, must be specified. Any additional expenditure associated with training must also be disclosed.

Maintenance and Support

The duration of the developer’s support and maintenance for the software program, as well as the terms of renewal, must be specified.

Maintenance

As new technology arrives, software evolves at a breakneck pace. This implies that if the software which is commissioned for has to work with other programs, it may need to be updated or upgraded before utilizing it. To avoid this issue, the software development agreement should include specific information on:

• What upgrades are expected to be required in order to keep up with technological advancements?
• Will the Company’s requirement for additional functionality be met through a maintenance contract or existing support services obligations?
• Who will be in charge of updating and upgrading the system?

It’s also worth noting that most developers reserve the right to stop providing support and maintenance for any previous version of software if a newer version is made accessible to the Company (the client).

Support

Although some support provisions may be included in a software development agreement, it is more common for support services beyond the installation and testing phase to be charged separately, or to be quoted separately if acquired as an Annual Support Agreement.

If intended to add assistance provisions in the contract, it should be specified:

• How will assistance be provided? (email, telephone, or in person).
• The kind of issues that the support services will address.
• Response times, particularly with regard to an Annual Support Agreement.
• Any limitations on support services, as well as any services that may be subject to additional fees.

Project time and cost

This component establishes the agreement on the project’s completion schedule and cost.   Indicate the hourly rates, development phases, goals, and deadlines for each.

The agreement should also state who is responsible for the delays by both parties. The inclusion of any partial payments that have been agreed upon based on the development progress. Annexes to the contract, such as payment schedules or development plans, may be referred to. The both parties must mandatorily sign any supplemental documents.

 Compensation

The contract must state the total monetary consideration payable by the corporation to the developer, as well as the breakup, which is commonly stated on an hourly basis. Further, the developer must specify the time intervals during which recurring bills must be sent. Any details concerning the initial and subsequent payments must also be mentioned.

 Intellectual Property Rights

The contract should state that the company will be granted copyrights and other intellectual property rights in relation to the software, such as trademarks if applicable.

One of the most crucial sections of the software development contract is this one. The company owns the software created as a result of the project, which should be stated clearly in the contract. Make certain that the contract has the following provisions:

• The source code should be owned by the company. By obtaining ownership of the source code, the company gains the ability to use or alter as it may see fit.
• In the event of contract termination, the company immediately owns the code has been completed thus far.
• All resources developed throughout the development process, including wireframes, drawings, and blueprints, must be destroyed.

The development business, on the other hand, can only reassign the rights to the property that they built. Any open-source tools that were utilized will be made available to the public.

 Further Changes

All information regarding the procedure for requesting changes to the software’s specifications must be provided. If the adjustments are appropriate, the developer may be required to accommodate them at no additional expense to the company. The corporation may also agree to provide additional pay in the future if major adjustments are implemented. It’s also possible to include provisions for reversing such changes.

Confidentiality

Confidentiality is one of the most important facets of a software development contract. The developer agrees not to provide any information about the company, its activities, or its clients to any third parties. In addition, the developer commits not to make copies of the software or distribute it to third parties.

While the Confidentiality part is standard in most service contracts, it is absolutely crucial in the information technology industry. Specify the information that is regarded confidential and the responsibility for the said disclosure.

The confidentiality terms in most software development contracts survive the contract itself, which means that the confidentiality should be maintained even after the contract is completed.

 Warranties from the developer

(a) The developer must guarantee that the program does not violate any agreements the developer has with third parties, and that it does not infringe on any third party’s intellectual property rights.

(b) The developer warrants that the program will run smoothly according to the company’s expectations and agrees to resolve any bugs that arise within the stated time frame. As the creator of the intellectual property, he or she must assign the rights to the corporation under the terms of the agreement.

(c) A disclaimer stating the developer is not responsible for any warranties not expressly stated in the contract may also be included.

Assignment

It should be mentioned that the developer may not delegate any contract rights to a third party without the company’s consent.

Indemnification

The developer undertakes to indemnify the company from any lawsuits that may occur as a result of the Developer’s infringement of third-party intellectual property rights.

No changes are permitted unless they are made in writing.

It should be mentioned that no amendment of the agreement will be permitted unless both parties agree.

Acknowledgements

The developer is an independent contractor, and the contract does not constitute any partnership, joint venture, employer-employee connection, or principal-agent relationship between the company and the developer.

It should also be noted that the contractual relationship will be one of “work for hire,” as defined by the Copyright Act of 1957.

Termination

The contract may specify the methods for terminating the agreement. It could be for particular reasons specified in the contract after giving the other party sufficient notice, such as a material breach of the contract’s terms or failing to perform any part of the contract. The non-breaching party has sole discretion over whether or not to cancel the agreement.

Jurisdiction in Cases of Dispute

The contract must state which court will have jurisdiction over any dispute arising from a breach of any of the provisions.

In the complicated realm of Intellectual Property Rights, a well-drafted Software Development Contract protects both the company’s and the developer’s rights and eliminates ambiguity.

Author: Vinita Gaud, Pravin Gandhi College of Law

Please contact us at info@origiin.com to know more about our services (Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Contract, IP Licensing, M&A of companies)

Subscribe to YouTube Channel HERE

Join LinkedIn Group: Innovation & IPR

WhatsApp: +91 74838 06607